Whilst I agree that the blog is probably hocum, there's nothing wrong with critical thinking.
The answer "let's throw everything out" isn't that useful; likewise, dismissing the considered opinion of lots of people who have been doing this sort of thing for a while needs to be done with some rationality. An empty, bandwagon-jumping appeal like this adds little value and just helps spread more misinformation.
Moving all the chess pieces at once, which is what is happening is not productive, professional or a sign of experience.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW&bug_s...
A lot of the bug descriptions are quite scarily bad when you consider them in context such as "various loginctl commands not working" etc.
That's the point – if systemd has important bugs they should be fixed. Clearly, the groups responsible for the decision have concluded that the tradeoff is worth it, and have accepted that a large, fundamental change will have issues. That's fine – there are a bunch of other distress you can use that have not adopted systemd, which you can use in the meantime if you disagree.
People are shipping production operating systems with systemd that is chock full of bugs.
An all consuming tentacle monster like systemd is fine if you want to dogfood it but to throw at paying customers and/or supporters of your distribution is a little off key.
A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it. Fifteen hundred years ago everybody knew the Earth was the center of the universe. Five hundred years ago, everybody knew the Earth was flat, and fifteen minutes ago, you knew that humans were alone on this planet. Imagine what you'll know tomorrow.I mean all these movie quotes are all cool sounding but are quite shallow.
Just because some thought has to go into the interpretation does't make it shallow.