Uber has now been deleted from my phone. I hope others consider doing the same.
Some of them even manage to do it without threatening reporters.
Anyway, watch this :-D
A concept so simple that is lost on so many.
Really? Then why is it so notable that the person is a "female journalist"? Why are people deliberately distorting "journalists are dragging our private affairs out to use against us, we should do it to them" as "he's threatening to reveal the locations of people's children"?
>are not behaving to a standard that people would support.
Many people do support, that's precisely what I said. I am supporting them, lots of people are supporting them.
The simple idea of "journalists are dragging our private affairs out to use against us, we should do it to them" is where these people fell down. Sure, some people are distorting it and it could therefore give the appearance of being pc, but in reality this is a moral problem.
Had they (he) held themselves to a higher standard, behaving in a morally responsible way, none of these things would happen and indeed they could be a leader in more ways than they originally intended to be (transportation).
HN posters are not a random sample.
Going by those assumptions, rule out the general public, and while I still don't have a random sample, I have something. Pretty much the only thing around without actually polling. And that only thing concludes the opposite of "lots of people are supporting them." But whatever, that's all smoke.