MICA – Intel Smart Bracelet
intel.com
intel.com
The amount of hurdles this needs to overcome to be purchased include:
-Willing to sign up for a cellular plan with AT&T
-Being Female and also thinking Intel is a fashionable company
-Willing to spend $500 on a fashion product from a company who mainly sells computer chips
-Find the design appealing, I have a strong hunch that this won't appeal to everyone from 13-90.
-Can stop in to one of these 2 "exclusive" stores to actually see what this thing is
-Accept the many limitations vs competitors (no voice input nor keyboard?)
-Actually believe this software/hardware will be upgraded ever again
-Willing to accept its lifespan is 2 years before you have to start paying a monthly fee to use it
Well, that's about the first quarter of my list but I've run out of time..
The device comes with AT&T mobile service "for free" with purchase and this might be a slightly more seamless experience for people (e.g. leave your phone at home). However... I don't know if people really would leave their phone at home unless they're out of the house for a brief time, like for a run.
I guess I get the philosophy: stop making smart watches look dorky, but I feel like the this goal is impossible because the phone has a display which feels... dorky.
Sidenote, what does the app development look like for this? Is someone like Yelp using specific internal resources to get the graphics to look right on the screen? Is the company just approving an app that someone else develops?
"MICA is connected by AT&T’s mobile broadband network and includes two years of wireless service with the device purchase."
Well that's horrible. You need to pay for two cell phone bills with this? And you are locked in with AT&T?
(And did anyone else find "Opening Ceremony" to be a really confusing name? I initially thought, is that like some variation on designed by committee?)
Also, don't bracelets rotate? Won't the screen randomly be in different positions?
It's ok. In two years these will all be forgotten in someone's sock drawer.
Seriously though, in two years the cell phone providers will have to come to grips with ancillary devices which use vanishingly small amounts of bandwidth. I suspect they just don't know how to bill them now.
It's not like they're charging you $120/mo like they would with your iPhone. The part of this that gets paid to AT&T is probably incredibly tiny compared to the cost that gets paid to the high-price designers slathering a smartwatch in gold and gemstones.
This is a Clumsy attempt at differentiation - DOA.
Easy talk aside it really is going to be tough for Intel to figure out the next.
Sounds like every big-corp "me-too" product.
The first paragraph:
My Intelligent Communications Accessory (MICA) [...]
I love product names that include the "my", so you never risk becoming confused about something as basic as ownership. Gaaah.
Also, can somebody please fix the submission's typo? It's BracElet, now it sounds like some kind of cross between a chewing gum and I don't know what.
Maybe I'm biased but I feel like they're a little late to the party and this just isn't up to par. Too many restrictions, no ecosystem, weird design...
/facepalm
Based on this product, I'll say that's because they really aren't.
Edit: It occurs to me that my (and that of likely most of the other folks here) perspective is a male one. Maybe there's women out there who'd like this.