EDIT: it was shown by the comment below that it was actually written by someone with a popular Polish female name. I was shaken by the article yesterday and thus oversensitive. Sorry about that.
- the binary has strings like `C:\Users\Agnieszka\...\Visual Studio 2013\Projects\Kalkulator1`. Agnieszka is a female Polish name -> the programmer is female. Although nobody really is using this as a discussion point anywhere, but hey, the fact is there if it's interesting to you.
- the code logic and layout is pretty convoluted and looks duct taped together, even considering it's decompiled from binary form -> the author is probably young and inexperienced, and/or this was extremely rushed.
Also, I'm not realy sure where anyone is “picking on females” here.
Can you give a few examples why is it so bad?
Here are a few, in my opinion, ugly examples:
https://github.com/wybory2014/Kalkulator1/blob/master/Kalkul... and https://github.com/wybory2014/Kalkulator1/blob/master/Kalkul... and a few more instances of basically the same logic, copy-pasted (correct me if this might have been optimized from source code, as I'm a reverse engineer and not a C# programmer - but I'm pretty sure it's not)
https://github.com/wybory2014/Kalkulator1/blob/master/Kalkul...
https://github.com/wybory2014/Kalkulator1/blob/master/Kalkul...
https://github.com/wybory2014/Kalkulator1/blob/master/Kalkul...
https://github.com/wybory2014/Kalkulator1/blob/master/Kalkul... and string-based HTML generation in general. Oh, and this method in general. It doesn't even fit on my screen without scrolling to the right.
I'm not saying it's a goldmine of DailyWTF-worth content - but it's still pretty bad. In general, it doesn't really follow any MVC-separation, the naming is arbitraty at best (and dictated by the IDE at worst - Kalkulator1, anyone?), and DRY principles are vastly ignored.
At least she used a fairly recent version Visual Studio...
If you position yourself as a victim, don't be surprised when you are treated this way.