Fitbit Data Now Being Used In The Courtroom
forbes.com
forbes.com
The convicted killer has no alibi and claims he can't remember what happened that day (he was arrested several weeks after the murder)...he thinks he might have been in the library at the time of the murder to check his email, but that was either never checked or either logged...there weren't as many cameras around his high school back then, and cell phones didn't have GPS nor were the towers conclusive in their pings (in terms of locating where a phone call took place).
Listening to that podcast is like listening to a time capsule, and I wonder if a muddled-up murder story like that could ever happen again? We carry around too many location-enabled devices out of habit and we log in and communicate across too many online systems to not leave a trace of what we do on any given day. If you were intent on committing murder, and fabricating a foggy alibi...leaving your Fitbit or phone behind, even for a few hours, might be used as circumstantial evidence against you.
This is just fear-mongering. The court only has access to this data because the owner of the data has brought it to the court as evidence in their case.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/parmyolson/2014/11/16/fitbit-dat...
His shirt was given to him, by a woman, as a good luck charm and he was crying on camera when asked about it.
Why can't we stop passing these shit writers and shit articles off as anything resembling news?
Should I start a #vergegate? or how about an #HNgate?
:-D
Update: I must have made someone afraid. Social media is dangerous. You shouldn't enjoy the power of the masses..when you yourself will eventually be the target.
You've been around long enough to know exactly why you're being down voted, and to know that it's not some conspiracy. Here, let me help: "off-topic". If that doesn't work for you, try "thread hijack".