The Dutch Village Where Everyone Has Dementia
theatlantic.com
theatlantic.com
Along with other speculation such as a seafood-heavy diet, it seems to me to be the reason that Japanese people live the longest.
(Nope, not a single thread of evidence in my post, Sorry. A quick google search somewhat agrees though)
In Korea, being cursed with a difficult mother-in-law is a leading cause of divorce.
It more or less guarantees to take women out of the workforce as they now have a house to run, take care of the kids and the in-laws. And unless you don't have kids or your husband's parents are dead or otherwise able to care for themselves, there's nothing you can do about it.
Not surprisingly Japan and South Korea have among the lowest female workforce participation among OECD countries.
It also means that incentive for higher education among women is mostly as a social marker for marriage, but then any education is thrown away once she gets married (and especially once she has a child).
This also puts enormous pressure on the husband to be the sole provider for himself, his wife, any kids, and his parents.
What about the daughter-in-law's parents? Well, they better have had a son at some point who finds a wife who will take care of them.
The list of social issues that come from this arrangement are long and madness inducing to study (or live with).
(edit) I'd add, there's a culture-bound psychological syndrome that's related to this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hwabyeong
I'm frequently disappointed when some of my friends, who are otherwise wildly educated and smart, with great careers, simply drop completely out of their field for no other reason than they finally met a man who can support her at the prestige level she's worked so hard to obtain.
Is this truly a side effect of the idea itself, or is this peculiar to Asian culture?
I'm a man, but if we had to care for my in-laws, I wouldn't consider this a burden. If anything, the opposite is quite true... my in-laws have always helped my wife and I through rough spots when they could.
We could adopt the custom without all of the baggage you describe, if we were so inclined.
1) If you don't want to care for your in-laws, there's little social safety net for them to retire on. Society is structured around this form of retirement.
2) Many women are now choosing not to get married in order to avoid being their mother-in-law's personal servant.
Here's a good writeup on the role http://msleetobe.wordpress.com/2010/06/18/on-obstacles-to-wh...
One of my Korean friends who married a Canadian man told me that one of the greatest perks of having a Canadian husband was that she did not have a demanding mother-in-law. They are legendary in Korea. Whether or not all mother-in-laws are as evil as they are sometimes portrayed, in general it is safe to say that they are somewhat more demanding, and the cultural expectations of a daughter-in-law are greater than in the mainstream Canadian context. My friend loves that during family gatherings she is a guest in her mother-in-law’s house instead of a worker serving men who do nothing but socialize and drink. She loves that she is not responsible for cleaning her mother-in-law’s house and does not have to prepare the enormous amount of food necessary for ancestral memorial rituals (and then be excluded from the ceremony because she is a woman). For her, marriage to her husband is about her relationship with her husband and not duty toward her mother-in-law.
I agree that there's cultural aspects of this. But there are always side effects of some sort. So adopting a model like this might mean that some of the unintentional side effects might come along as well.
Not to mention the total nullification of privacy. Not everything I do I want my parents to see, and I'm not even gay, transgender, of a different religion than my parents, or any other controversial topic your parents might disown you for.
And you thought having kids was bad? Try dealing, day to day, with your dementing parents that shit themselves and do not recognize you anymore.
As a community of problem-solvers I feel it's important to always describe possible causes, effects and solutions to present a clear image of a situation.
"Eldar abuse" is a significant cause of harm to older people.
Dementia is not a simple illness. Next time you visit a specialist dementia hospital ask why their crockery is red. http://www.bcf.nhs.uk/docs/14053_1922582528.doc
> Deliberate use of colour cues can also help significantly. For example, one study with people with advanced Alzheimer's disease showed that changing to highly visible red cups and plates led to a 25 per cent increase in food intake and an 84 per cent increase in liquid consumption. Brightly coloured toilet doors have also been used successfully in a variety of care settings to help people with dementia find the toilet independently, and more readily.
But these losses of visual ability are masked when someone is in their familiar home. People don't realise that the older person can't see the mug - they just assume the older person is not thirsty.
I am taken back by your formulation here. Do you imply that children abusing their parents is the norm?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-24399139
It seems I was wrong!
> Of these, 38% of the alleged abuse took place in the older person's home, while 45% took place in a care home.
> Physical abuse and neglect were the most common types of abuse reported.
> In 6% of cases the alleged abuser was the older person's partner, in 16% it was another family member and in 37% a social care worker.
On less extreme side, my inlaws play mallet golf religiously. Wake up every day at 6am then they spend most of the day walking around playing, they have a whole room dedicated to their trophies.
Other than that, cool article. It's not far from where I live, but I'd never heard of it. Hard to get in, apparently. I hope they open more places like this before my parents get to the point where they might need it.
I think part of the mentality is that he got to go out on his own terms, with a sound mind, and knowing he had taken care of everything he wanted to - and living in a home is a burden and not a pleasant way to spend the remainder of your days, wondering who will visit you and when.
Now replace every child with an octogenarian who hasn't seen his family in six weeks, or maybe just saw his family yesterday for his birthday but doesn't remember at all. Replace the apples and letters on the walls with Cardiograms and notices about patient safety and how dedicated the employee who was on the shift when your grandmother's wedding band went missing is to her care.
It's a problem that a lot of people want to ignore because it really is hard to think about it.
My grandmother was in one, in the 90's, and it was quite a nice place with an active social life (which she pretty much ignored, because she had lots of family around).
Nitpicking: Why do they give the cost for this solution "per month", and then for comparison the costs in the US "per day" and "per year"? Did they choose to make it harder to make a comparison??
Hogewey = $8,000/month or $96,000/year.
US Average = $90,500/year.
Perhaps their comparison was to point out that for roughly the same cost, you get much better care (outcomes) in the unique facility.
"But because cost is one of the greatest barriers to making self-contained villages the standard in dementia care, it would be extremely difficult to implement in a non-socialized healthcare system—meaning that in the U.S., a facility like Hogewey might be impossible for the forseeable future."
--
From other parts of the article:
"The cost of care [at Hogeway] is nearly $8,000 per month..."
"To put it into perspective, a private room at a U.S. nursing home cost an average of $248 per day in 2012, or more than $90,500 annually" => $7541.67/month
--
So, the average cost in the US is the same, but "due to the high cost" the US (with its non-socialized medicine) could never build a comparable program?
I'm pretty confident that the healthcare system in the US would not be able to bring down the cost down to ~4k/family.
I think they're talking about up-front capital, not recurring/maintenance costs, but it's hard to tell since we don't know whether the $8,000 a month includes the amortized costs...
In the town Sliedrecht there is also an area called 'Merwebolder' which is a small 'wijk' for mentally disabled people housing around 400 people.
Once things had gone so far that they could not take care of themselves, and could not manage with the help of their spouses, they just fell apart within months.
Untold Stories: Dementia Village