Ted Cruz Op-Ed Against Net Neutrality
washingtonpost.com
washingtonpost.com
There are reasonable arguments to be made for net neutrality but these aren't them.
They're usually centered on the ability of the government to enforce neutrality and whether companies would have the incentive to continue to upgrade their infrastructure. Another decent argument is that some files and services deserve higher priority (live medical data, critical VOIP, etc.) which would be illegal under NN. I think more broadly, NN is market distorting by design and will lead to many unintended consequences.
Andreessen - http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-switch/wp/2014/05/21...
Progressive Policy Institute - http://www.progressivepolicy.org/issues/economy/regulating-o...
Some good answers on Quora - http://www.quora.com/What-are-the-strongest-arguments-agains...
Really?
His politics are ugly and cynical but he graduated Cum Laude from Princeton, Magna Cum Laude from Harvard Law, he clerked for Chief Justice Rehnquist, his legal aptitude was a big reason for Bush's success in Bush v. Gore (he also recruited John Roberts to the cause), and he's successfully argued in front of the Supreme Court many times.
There's no question whatsoever about his intelligence. If only he wasn't a christian dominionist.. [http://www.huffingtonpost.com/morgan-guyton/the-theology-of-...]