> Whether that proof was correct is definitely up for debate.
No, no it's not.
You're not really understanding mathematics, which is fair enough, but also the fundamentals of science and human nature with a statement like that.
No, no it's not.
You're not really understanding mathematics, which is fair enough, but also the fundamentals of science and human nature with a statement like that.
Without having seen the proof that came to Fermat's mind, I don't think it's anyone's absolute opinion on the matter that "It's not up for debate" and that Fermat's proof being potentially true is "missing the fundamentals of science".
If you may re-read my previous post, here's the thing people disagree on : "Did Fermat write this having a correct proof of it on his mind or not?" I do not think anyone can say an absolute "yes" or "no" to this. Although it does point to "no", considering that the mathematics used to prove FLT are far beyond Fermat's time.