Driven to distraction
economist.com
economist.com
The only real 'solution' to distracted driving is to start building an America where we don't have to drive everywhere. Get people out from behind the wheel. Cars are inherently dangerous and Americans are forced to use them far, far too often.
You'll probably get this. In another couple of decades, it may be illegal to drive manually on public roads ...
I realize that there are two parties in the interaction, myself and the other drivers I may effect should I get into an accident. But were the effects of an accident limited solely to me, I am sure that the utility I get from being able to coordinate with others while on the road is greater than the cost of a marginal increase in the chance of an accident.
Are you sure? The study the article cites (see http://www.vtnews.vt.edu/story.php?relyear=2009&itemno=5... ) says that for light cars (trucks are worse), the risk of crashing is 1.3 (1.4, 2.8) times higher for talking on (reaching for, dialing) a cell phone.
I'd say that increase in risk is significant, especially because the potential cost of an accident, even if you don't involve anyone else, is so high.
Sitting here thinking about it, I'd rather miss a call.
(EDIT, the study actually said crash or near-crash event. Not sure how to process that.)