Secrets of the Magus: Ricky Jay does closeup magic that flouts reality (1993)
newyorker.com
newyorker.com
His incredible 52 Assistants show is on youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jljt5Ml28FU
I bet if you disallow images the site renders poorly, too.
Maybe disallow the letter "e" and see what happens.
If all websites that don't really need javascript for anything but bling that makes marketeers happy and users miserable got rid of it tomorrow, worldwide, I wonder how many coal power plants could be shut down?
There is one way to find out, and one step to get there is to not put up with this nonsense anymore. Driving a car with the handbrakes on to get a pack of cigarettes is not modern, not progress, not sophisticated, and not exactly dignified either.
Why is javascript "critical" here? It's really critical, as in there's no other way to go from viewing one set of text to another set of text on a page without javascript?
This site cannot be reproduced without images or the letter "e". It can be reproduced without javascript. Trivially.
I'd think things would go similarly with Javascript. :-) If you don't want AJAX and local tasks such as validation, you can still construct practical stuff without it.
(Most of my oral discussions with folks work practically without using Javascript... I'm not as optimistic about my browsing, though!)
"Good job! I sought to say what I thought about your post in a similar fashion, but I found it wasn't as straightforward in actuality as it was in my anticipation."
This constraint is not what you could call most hard of all constraints that folks can comply with in writing. Many moons ago, I had many chats with a smart woman (an IT industry analyst, nowadays a VC!) using only four-symbol words (words just as long, or just as short, as "full" and "with"). All right, it wasn't always an option for us to comply fully with standard grammar; a substantial fraction of our writing did consist of partial phrasings (lacking a noun, or lacking an additional pars orationis, as folks would say in Latin -- say, "good work" and not "that's a good job"). Still, that woman and I could chat for a fairly long duration in this fashion, about a surprisingly broad array of topics.
I wish I had logs of our chats now, inasmuch as that constraint is fairly hard... I do think I said "Good Airs" in such a chat as a way of naming a capital city of a country south of Brazil. But much that I said is hard to think of now.
[0] http://www.amazon.com/Disparition-French-Language-Georges-Pe...
[1] http://www.amazon.it/Allalba-Shahrazad-ammazzata-Giuseppe-Va...
Also, at MIT's annual January puzzling match, I had fun solving this most-common-thousand-words thing (it has a list of cool stuff that you can study at MIT if you want to know how to build flying things... but all in most-common-thousand-words-only fashion).
http://www.mit.edu/~puzzle/2013/enigmavalley.com/you_will_no...
Its solution is at
http://www.mit.edu/~puzzle/2013/enigmavalley.com/you_will_no...
I thought it was a Hunt classic and did honor to xkcd too.
Also, I don't appreciate the sarcastic tone of your comment. It's not necessary and I can see by the comments below that you are wrong and out of line.
It was then translated in to English as "A Void", also without using the letter "e".
The eye-opening and amazing part is the unrelenting practice, preparation, and study time Ricky Jay (and others in the documentary) have committed to the art.
Beautiful and inspiring to see that effort from people.
"magic consists of taking more pains than anyone will possibly consider worth it"
Or sane perhaps. Kind of says it all
Edit: quote from memory of a TV show some years ago - can't find it.
[1] http://chronicle.com/article/The-Magical-Mind-of-Persi/12940...
I just came across the show, carbonaro effect, where the magician uses everyday stores to play tricks on unsuspecting people. I like this shows concept because its less about how he did the trick and more about how easy it is too fool people into believing in otherworldly events or products.
The guy was doing a trick where he wrote on a ping pong ball, gave it to me to look at, destroyed it and then made it reappear.
While I was looking at it I marked it with my thumbnail.
When it reappeared he asked me to verify that it was the same, but it didn't have the nail-mark on it, so I told him that it definitely wasn't, and how I knew.
I was 12 and my parents were furious with me about it.
For some reason they never ever took me to a magic show again.
I want to believe that a better magician would have noticed and reproduced the mark.
Heh, I could probably talk to a shrink for several days solid about that.
In their view at the time I ruined it for everyone and wasted the money of the entire audience and possibly ruined the career of the poor magician too and if I had any kind of feeling for others I would have played along and just lied. It was socially unacceptable behaviour, apparently. I found the whole thing completely bewildering.
That said, the story said he did it the length of the table, which implies a more natural specificity which could either confirm a confederate, or else was retrospectively embellished.
(Imagine a version of the story where he turns and fires the cards into a bookshelf and instructs someone to open a particular book.)
But the confederate is a much simpler explanation. It's just whether the coordination and trust in a confederate to keep the secret to the grave can be greater than the cost of the setup and the potential for early revelation.
Not sure what the tech world equivalent of that would be--maybe a nouveau riche Tinder founder acquiring all the original artifacts of historic computing in the Computer History Museum, moving them to Branson, Missouri, and putting them backstage of a Yakov Smirnoff dinner theatre show.