If we get into this sort of semantic aerobics, we are just talking about words.
The context of the statement is a message to the general public, in America. The language he used has a particular meaning in the context.
The context of the statement is a message to the general public, in America. The language he used has a particular meaning in the context.
Again, my objection is one of incomprehension. How can one reject the teachings of a religion while still identifying with said group?