Why Your Cat Thinks You’re a Huge, Unpredictable Ape
wired.com
wired.com
1. Any cat > any thing, no matter how expensive. I wish my carpets and furniture weren't all scratched up, but I really don't care that much.
Corollary: Any manager > any project. The project may fail, but the manager may do another.
2. Let the cat initiate all action. They will let you know when they want to eat/sleep/play/cuddle/hang out. Respond predictably to their action.
Corollary: Keep coding until interrupted by your manager. Smile, listen, pretend to care, agree. Then continue coding.
3. Every time you return (even from the mailbox), greet the cat as if you hadn't seen each other for years. I don't know how cats perceive the passage time, but what difference does that really make?
Corollary: Document everything discussed with your manager and share the notes during your next meeting to remind them of what they probably won't remember.
4. Listen to the cat. They do have words, just not in the same language. Tonality and body language leave very important clues.
Corollary: Learn the definition of terms like: bandwidth, key results, deep dive, follow-up, subject matter expert, and ROI so you know what the hell your manager is talking about.
5. Include the cat in your plans when applicable. They may surprise you by enjoying watching football on TV, relaxing in the yard, or even eating together.
Corollary: Give your manager a status report so they know what's going on. Otherwise, they'll just interrupt you when you're right in the middle of coding a difficult algorithm.
6. If the cat gets scared, growls, scratches, or bites, you probably did something wrong. Identify and correct the problem.
Corollary: If the project fails, it's your fault because it can't be your manager's fault.
7. Even though it's not human, the cat is a member of your family and should be treated accordingly.
Corollary: Even though they can't code and have never built anything, your manager deserves as much respect as anyone else.
The idea that a creature that enjoys destroying your possessions, arbitrarily ignoring you for most of its life despite depending entirely upon you, expects total obedience despite no contribution or investment, has never earned a dollar in its life and has no concept of what a dollar is or why that might be important to it, intrinsically deserves anything so important as respect is ridiculous.
I'm not suggesting you leave your cat or your manager out to rot with the garbage (though I wouldn't argue, in most cases). But to suggest that either of these creatures, by default, deserves any measure of respect is hilarious to me.
Huh? What has earning money got to do with respect? Many people I respect don't have money as any of their main goals. Surely, money is only a means to an end and not an end in itself.
I bet you make a GREAT babysitter.
"has never earned a dollar in its life and has no concept of what a dollar is or why that might be important to it"
[...]
“How the hell is your cat supposed to know that you’re yelling at him because you want him to stop scratching the couch?”
[...]
"When your cat does the thing you want her do to, reward her with a treat, or affection."
If we accept that cats can't learn from negative reinforcement, why would we think that positive reinforcement would work?
And punishment works quite differently from reinforcement to begin with; it is typically less effective for far better socialized species such as humans and dogs, too.
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operant_conditioning#Consequenc...
People mix this up all the time, and it gives me an eye twitch. Psych 101 people, cmon.
Domestic cats have been domesticated for a long time. Cats which live with humans (or even other cats - they do naturally form colonies) adopt a number of pro-social behaviours to interact with us.
They are in fact very adept at reading social cues - but conversely they are not pack-animals. They don't have the same instinctive need to identify a hierarchy of command, so much as "mess with" and "don't mess with".
That sounds like lamarckism. Or do you suggest that cats were selectively bred for their social behaviour? I find it dubious.
Cats happened about the same time agriculture did. They were attracted to the rodents, and less rodents meant we were happier - and they were happier with a reliable food source. At the beginning it might have helped to not be afraid of humans, but we probably didn't mess with them too much because they were helping us out with all the mice in our grains.
So the difference in behavior is clear, not just from a social species standpoint, but from the domestication path:
The European Wolf was domesticated to dogs as a hunting partner; the African Wildcat was domesticated to kill the rodents that devoured our foodstuffs. For the few few thousand years that was probably enough - they didn't have to make friends with us, just keep our food safe.
Earliest cat domestication evidence is 9,500 years old; earliest dog domestication evidence is about 36,000 years old.
They've still got quite a ways to go ;) Now if we could just start breeding them for social/intelligence instead of how weird and fluffy we can make them. Hard to morally advocate for breeding when the shelter/feral population is so damn high, though. (I feel the same way about dogs, though, tbh).
Increase of reproductive success is not an evolutionary pressure and is irrelevant in the context of the comment I was replying to.
And increase of reproductive success of a very similar population puts all kinds of evolutionary pressure on the less-advantaged population, as they compete for the same things. But more to the point, regardless of the exact words that your parent poster used, they clearly did not mean a very narrow definition of evolutionary pressure.
You should check your detector.
[Edit] Changed negative reinforcement to punishment, rbehrends was correct when he pointed out that negative reinforcement is something different.
Positive and negative reinforcement patterns are not opposites, they're entirely separate processes.
(Cat owner here.)
For a dog, yelling is a punishment on its own, because they understand what the tone of voice means. A cat will just think "hmm, the human got louder - I wonder why?" If you're trying to punish a cat for things, you either need a physical stimulus they don't like (spray bottle, for example) or a social cue they understand (hissing is moderately effective, though that's more of a warning than a punishment).
I thought the same thing. I hate that any comment on a HN post adds to it's score. I would like this comment counted as a negative. This article is terrible.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PnbRoRmRV2c
(I normally don't watch long videos).
People ask why I don't use Youtube. This is a big contributing factor.
Just torrent it and send a polite email to the BBC asking them to make it available in your area, or watch it on BBC iPlayer if it's available to you.
I ran into the same thing: Cat pooped in exotic, awkward places, but never the litter box. Never looked like she was in pain -- just being stubborn, I figured. Turned out to be a bladder stone brought on by the ingredients in modern cat food (put in place to help other feline health issues, but which causes stones in a small subset of cats). After the stones were cleared up, all litter box issues disappeared.
My cats don't like the uber-expensive clot-forming synthetic crystal litter, and don't like various types of alternatives either - almost none from this list: http://www.petco.com/Shop/ShoppingGuides/petco_ChooseCatLitt... )
..but they do love some simple pebbles, which are, fortunately, dirt-cheap (or pebble-cheap :) ) although a little messier to clean than the above alternatives. I think they'd like sand as well (I live in Uruguay and those pebbles are from Argentina, so I don't know what alternatives are in the U.S.).
So in the utility room I used for the litter boxes, I replaced the carpet with some cheap engineered wood flooring (Pergo or some similar knockoff brand). Problem went away. I think it is very weird/uncomfortable for them to go on a smooth hard surface, and carpet is a rougher surface that sort of could feel like dirt or grass.
If there's a regular spot where he goes, maybe try putting a box on that exact spot. We had a similar problem a few months ago, where our cat was peeing in the basement on a stack of paper he found. We moved everything away from that spot and put a box there and now he's happy as a clam.
For two cats, we have three litter boxes that are cleaned daily, new litter is added every couple of weeks as the level of the litter goes down, and then the boxes are fully emptied and fresh litter added about every three months, and that keeps them mostly happy. Unfortunately, one of the cats will periodically pee outside the box even when the box is perfectly clean, and the reasons are many, and somewhat ambiguous.
Sometimes it's the litter. Either we're trying a new litter, or the manufacturer changes the litter, and the cat doesn't like the new litter for some reason.
Sometimes it's the environment. She's using the litter box and there's a sudden noise for some reason, and then she won't use that box again for a while. Not really a problem when we have three boxes, unless she's been startled while using all of them within a short period of time.
Sometimes she's feeling stressed out. If we rearrange the furniture, the seasons are changing (generally only going into winter does this seem to be a problem,) can't pay as much attention to her for a prolonged period of time, go on vacation, or bring home a new child, she's far more prone to peeing outside the litter box.
She never poops outside the litter box, only ever pees.
We've pretty much just formed a routine to minimize the peeing issues. We keep the litter boxes clean, we make sure we pay enough attention to her, and we try to encourage her to use her litter box at least once a day. If we haven't seen her pee in the litter box for a few days (does not mean she hasn't used it, just hasn't used it in front of us) we start to minimize the available options for her to pee in/on (easier than it sounds, she tries to find substitutes for her litter box, so anything box like, or that she can use to bury, like throw rugs.)
I've also seen way too many FIV+ cats come through the shelter system, transferred when they're attacked by FIV+ strays. If you ever need to give up your pet, FIV+ status is an immediate death sentence in many shelters. In no-kill shelters, it means a longer stay because some people are weirded out about "cat AIDS".
[1] http://planetbratfink.blogspot.com/2013/11/the-story-of-ange...
On a serious note: cats usually integrate well with their ecosystem and if they would really pose such a big threat, smaller mammals and brids would just migrate away. edit: I'm speaking of balanced ecosystems where cats have natural enemies, foxes and whatnot.
The majority of birds that cats kill are frail, in poor health, or otherwise likely to have not made it through the season anyway.
[1]:http://www.rspb.org.uk/makeahomeforwildlife/advice/gardening...
I doubt that those are all frail and doomed to an early death.
That's exactly what you don't want happening in an ecosystem.
Great suggestion.
But it's the complete opposite in the U.S, and although that makes sense in some places (a lot more predators in the countryside), in a city like San Francisco the risks seem identical to those of London. It's very strange. Of course, in the UK cat owners aren't legally liable for their cat's actions (cats, unlike dogs, are deemed by the law to be free agents), maybe that's not the case in the states.
Cats do kill wildlife, but their impact is often overstated. The RSPB (Royal Society for the Protection of Birds) in the UK has no issues with cats being let out, but recommend they have bells on their collars. The majority of birds that cats kill are sick, frail, or otherwise in poor health.
To quote the RSPB: "there is no scientific evidence that predation by cats in gardens is having any impact on bird populations UK-wide"[1].
[1]:http://www.rspb.org.uk/makeahomeforwildlife/advice/gardening...
(We've had a lot of "missing cat" signs on the group mailboxes lately. Woods nearby. Expanding populations of fishers, coyotes, wolves, etc. Did I mention I'm 15 minutes from Parliament Hill? Bears downtown, -35 C winters (with serious wind and a whole lotta snow), +35 C summers (with 90+% humidity), wild beasties in the woods.... I really love Ottawa. I mean, I must. No rationale person would live here otherwise.)
Cats do occasionally get run over, but most learn to avoid dogs and if they're getting second helpings of dinner at someone else's house, so what?
His approach to behavioral problems in cats is quite fascinating. And it seems to work. For anyone involved with cats, this is a must-see.
I was never a Wired subscriber, but a lot of content now seems garbage I used to joyfully consume as a teenager.
I don't know. The one time I got seriously mad at Yoshi (my cat) was when he bit through an ethernet cable. That was the one single time I've actually squirted water at him and threw him out of my appartment.
Since then neither my ethernet cables nor my iPhone USB cables got bitten through any more (he also knows that chewing on iphone cables and headphones is a very good way to get attention).
There's a lot of stuff I let slide with him (maybe too much - I love him to bits), but he really seems to respect the fact that chewing on cables is a total no-go (also: bloody dangerous - some carry current)
Several paragraphs to say "Your cat can't figure out negative reinforcement - their brains just can't handle it! Change the environment instead."
Then right next to that, it's all "You should give your cat positive reinforcement, that totally works!"
Not that it's bad advice to have positive reinforcement come from you and negative reinforcement come from the environment, but the explanation is poor.
The 6 month old Russian Blue? Not so much. I get the feeling that "negative reinforcement" doesn't apply to all cats all the time.
There's a couch she likes best but I don't want her on it; every time she goes near it I just say "no" and she turns around (she won't get off of it if she's already on it by voice alone, though).
If there's no food left for her she comes to my study and does a very specific meow, and I know I need to replenish the thing.
She sleeps during the day and lives outside during the night, bringing back the occasional dead mouse on the front porch in the morning.
We don't have that many interactions but we understand one another, I think, pretty well.
Nobody buys this.
He's been a great addition to our family but, to sum up my experience with a cat: he's an overly neurotic animal with some of the finest reflexes I've ever witnessed.
Your cat can no more learn not to do that, than it can control its sleep.
Unfortunately, the author asserts it without evidence. How cats understand cause and effect relative to humans is something I ponder from time to time.
If you're cat goes outside you tend not to need scratching posts and litter trays for starters.
Get a litter box and clean up after your own damn pet.
Unless you're literally living on a farm, the world is not your pet's latrine. Give them somewhere to do their business and/or clean up after them.
But one thing I know about cats is they really have a set routine, getting them to change it is near impossible, you juat have to go with the flow.
>“Cats don’t understand glass, but they do understand height,” Buffington says
This statement is false, my cat definitely understands what glass is.
My cat loves me and thinks I am a giant cuddly friend.
And dispenser of food.