Less.Mail – An email assistant that makes you work less
less.robinlabs.com
less.robinlabs.com
I think the demos in this video look neat but I don't see myself using AI for anything that I have to rely on any time soon. I would constantly feel the need to double check it anyway.
Joe> Keep responding that I'm working on it
Bob> Keep reminding Joe that the report is urgent each time he responds
You have to put a lot of faith into that software if you actually use it while driving because checking if the answer is correctly chosen with the phone hanging over the wheel is a big no-no in my driver's book (it does beat actually typing out the message with one hand but that is already an even bigger no-no).
Semi-automatic voice activated replies is something I'd like to try out to see how it feels though. I am curious how the experience would work out considering I am more of pushing buttons guy.
Next up: "Tell Zuck I can't make his birthday party"
I thought it was a joke product too.
What I like about my email is that I don't have any push notifications from it. I check it when I want to.
Granted I'm not the kind of person who gets a lot of emails and thus would benefit from an AI email assistant.
However, looking beyond this challenge, the idea is still cool and having an AI assistant to sort out your inbox will be certainly a breakthrough technology. Besides web, email is perhaps one of the greatest innovations of the 20th century but it needs to be brought in the 21st, i.e Email 2.0.
I can use email fairly successfully, Siri does a pretty good job but if this works as advertised I would definitely love to try it.
Thanks.
(beware their site is based on frames)
Does it work with handsfree?
Companies like to pretend that they have some magic AI that makes things just work but we simply aren't there yet, and far from it.
If you don't want to take the time to reply, then don't bother sending me anything at all. And it's not about having a crazy schedule. We have time. In fact, we have more time than ever before because robots already automate repetitive tasks. But a human interaction is not a repetitive task IMO.
I regularly schedule meetings through people's assistants and they probably reply to my emails to, but I don't know about it. This will be the same thing.
This takes that to even another level of 'nope' for me by reading my emails aloud to whoever is around. The video example is exactly the stuff that I wouldn't want other people hearing.
I don't know much about this type of AI work, but I can tell you a little about the scale of things where I do work.
I work with kana/kanji conversion and it is a similar problem as just getting the phonetics part of speech to text sorted out. First you convert the sound signal to phonetics, then you need to convert the phonetics to actual sentences. A surprising amount of English sentences have the same phonetics, so it is a non-trivial task to make sense of these. Try saying "Recognize Speech" and "Wreck a nice beach" out loud.
I'd dare say Japanese is even worse, so a lot of data is used to infer what the writer means with the phonetic input in kana/kanji conversion.
Baidu uses 2.5 terrabyte[1] of data for their kana/kanji conversion system, which has both an online and offline part, where the online part makes use of all the data and boosts performance considerably.
The remaining 10% maybe it'd be useful, but it'd need to be useful enough for me to learn two separate ways of doing things - one with the spoken interface, and one without.
I have a tough enough time with IVR systems today because of my kids talking in the background that I have to switch to touch tone mode.
How does this work in the real world?