Bill Joy: Why the future doesn't need us (2000)

If I were one of the machines I would replay the Armageddon foreseen by the big religions. I would create a simulated judgment day and put the good humans in heaven and evil ones in hell. In heaven put an abundant supply of everything satisfying all needs for the domestic pets and in hell put all scientists, philosophers.

It might be equally interesting to discover why these various futures are impossible (if they are).

Has anyone shown, for example, that in an Artificial life system (or cellular automata perhaps). That a single form can always be introduced that will dominate the system?

If this isn't always the case, what conditions are required for there to be a form that can dominate the system?

"I was also reminded of the Borg ofStar Trek, a hive of partly biological, partly robotic creatures with a strong destructive streak."

The Borg did not destroy. They did not delete and discard. They assimilated. Your biological and technological distinctiveness gets added to theirs. A Borg-like race will save humanity, if it ever comes to that.

Early humans: "The future doesn't need us"

Hunter-gatherers: "The future doesn't need us"

Bill Joy: "The future doesn't need us"

Nothing new here and they all were right.

Please put the year (2000) in the title, along with the author's name, Bill Joy; to prompt the few that haven't read this to reconsider, and to prompt those who have read it all those years ago, to read it again.