This has never been more true when it comes to ride sharing companies.
Monopolies benefit next to nobody, while Uber benefits a lot of people.
Seriously? Never been more true?
Prohibiting unlicensed rides-for-hire (it's not 'ride sharing') is more unjust than say...Jim Crow laws?
Obviously defeating the taxi monopolies is less important than defeating slavery.
>>This has never been more true when it comes to ride sharing companies.
___"WHEN IT COMES TO RIDE SHARING COMPANIES"___, that part of the sentence is important. As in, you didn't say "when it comes to human rights!" or something overly-dramatic like that. You reduced the scope to only ride sharing. And I'm assuming you didn't edit your comment after the replies.
No, I did not. Thank you for backing me up there.
I was a bit confused as to his protest of my wording of the comment. I certainly did not mean to say that ride sharing is the most important debate of our time.
I only meant that the quote is perfectly fitting to the current situation surrounding ride sharing and the taxi monopolies.
The way you misread it, it would indeed seem to say that the situation with ride sharing companies violating the law is exactly what old Thomas Jefferson was talking about. But you misread it, obviously.
I'm totally missing any "profundity" here, sorry.
And I don't even like Uber; I think in general they treat their drivers like crap, and I realize that they are only flouting this law because it stands in the way of their business model. But just as with Tesla (a company I do respect), they are breaking new ground and showing the rest of the country that these archaic laws exist only to protect the establishment. The laws should be reexamined, and if the people find that the laws are incompatible with their needs, the laws should be changed.
I pay friends for "gas" when they come and pick me up drunk at the bar, for example. It's not really much different than hiring out UberX.
http://www.monticello.org/site/jefferson/spurious-quotations