A growing desire to avoid gluten is changing the food industry
economist.com
economist.com
Stores are already full of gluten free products. I made a tasty homemade beef vegetable stew yesterday in the slow cooker with beef and carrots and potatoes and celery and thats about it (well, some spices, some salt, water, etc). This is what real gluten free substitutes look like. It tasted awesome. This is the kind of GF substitute I've come to expect, not a GF hot pocket or a GF package of oreos.
There's a big business around convincing people they have to buy substitutes so they can keep stuffing their faces with (now gluten free!) twinkies until they die of diabetes at 500 pounds. I'm totally not interested in that kind of substitute. If their processed food business model loses money or wastes executive bonus money on R+D or even better, outright dies out, I'm not going to shed any crocodile tears in my homemade beef stew.
You can see the propaganda way of steering thought by careful word choice:
"Sales of alternatives to meat have flattened"
They've flattened because they're disgusting soy based hyper processed plastic weirdness pumped out of a chemical plant that isn't really fit for human consumption. Not because nobody eats salads anymore.
The whole article is like describing modern online music stores as selling "vinyl free product, even though most buyers don't medically need vinyl free music". Its people complaining the world has passed their business model by. If people aren't buying your toxic cellophane wrapped people-fattener products anymore, instead of trying even weirder chemical plant processing or stealth marketing with complimentary copy, just sell me some cheap lettuce and stop complaining.
Just because there are GF Oreo's doesn't mean you have to eat them. And to counter your observation, in my experience GF food generally tastes alright. My partner is allergic. It's "overpriced" (market priced, really) because it's lower volume and depending on the GF substitute it may be more difficult to produce.
[0] http://slatestarcodex.com/2014/03/30/wheat-much-more-than-yo...
Gluten is awesome!
When made well (and fresh), it has the texture of the tenderest chicken or pork you've ever eaten. And, it should not taste like flour, at all. It's mostly the protein from wheat (I use Bob's Red Mill vital wheat gluten, which is 80% protein), and none of the other components that taste starchy or bread-like.
I've been using a variation of this recipe as the basis of my seitan experiments: http://www.theppk.com/2009/11/homemade-seitan/
I make a double batch and still use less broth and water (I use six cups total simmering liquid for a double batch), as the recipe calls for way too much.
For sausage, I add rubbed sage, thyme, cayenne pepper, fresh minced ginger, and white pepper. A touch of brown sugar is also a reasonable addition. Once boiled, I slice it into 1/4" patties and put it into the toaster oven, on a pan oiled with a bit of peanut oil, to broil for 5-10 minutes to make it sizzly and a little crispy. It really is pretty awesome; I serve it with vegan biscuits and gravy (I make the gravy from the remaining broth from the seitan cook).
In short, seitan is one of my absolute favorite foods. I was ambivalent about it, until I had really good fresh seitan at a vegetarian Chinese restaurant. I tried for years to find some at the store that was as good, and was always disappointed. The key seems to be to make it fresh.
But I try to limit my carbs now and I do hate the looks I get when I ask for a gluten free menu just to see the entire offerings of a restaurant(and then I feel doubly dumb when sometimes the menu is just a listing of the already gluten-free plates on the normal menu).
Anyone with basic reasoning skills, understanding of elementary biology, and the Wikipedia article on gluten could tell you that this gluten-free fad is completely fatuous.
Maybe it is the decline in religion - without a seemingly senseless deity to blame - the search goes on for other reasons. When the answer is always in the one who asks.
http://southpark.cc.com/full-episodes/s18e02-gluten-free-ebo...
The other kids stuff their faces, roar around feeding off the energy of the party, and go home happy.
If we are going to talk about anything, it should be unhealthy obsessiveness with diets. Get some exercise, eat fresh foods for the most part. Go crazy and eat some ice cream ,pizza or chocolate cake once in a while. Job done.
They are however specific to the latest hypochondriac food fad that's swept the nation and as numerous controlled studies on random non-celiac populations are starting demonstrate with Science, are treatment for disorders (NCGS) that don't even exist.
It appears that "gluten sensitivity" industry (an $11 billion dollar industry) is now about to run its course, so the next fads are starting to spin up, FODMAPs or Frutates or whatever is probably the next big thing. And guess what my prediction is going to be, all those people who complain of vague non-specific NCGS will start eating Gluten again without any complaint and completely forget about it, while simultaneously froggering over to FODMAP free diets or whatever to deal with their vague non-specific hypochondriac symptomologies.
No, that's not true. My daughter has celiac disease; she has a severe version, so we found this out when she was about 4 years old.
However, in later life my mother suffered from serious food sensitivity problems. She wasn't diagnosed with celiac because that was 15+ years ago. Given my daughter's medical history, I'd bet even odds that celiac was exactly what my mother had, even though the serious problems didn't occur until old age. There is a very strong genetic component to the disease. Wikipedia discusses this at length, but I'm certainly not qualified to know how accurate that information is.
So it's quite possible that with less severe celiac, people only have mild symptoms or only develop severe symptoms late in life.
Sorry to quote Wikipedia, they're hardly authoritative, but I think this is a reasonable summary[1]:
People with milder coeliac disease may have
symptoms that are much more subtle and occur
in other organs than the bowel itself. It is
also possible to have coeliac disease without
any symptoms whatsoever. Many adults with
subtle disease only have fatigue or anaemia.
Edit: just wanted to add that information in this field is changing rapidly. When I requested a DNA test for my daughter about 8 years ago, her gastroenterologist was reluctant. He was admittedly quite surprised when my daughter turned out to have the problem alleles. So it's all "relatively new" even for one of the "experts" in the 19th most populous MSA in the United States.But replacing one processed ingredient with another, doesn't make much difference.
http://www.realclearscience.com/blog/2014/05/gluten_sensitiv...
Question 2: Why do you call gluten "processed"? It is a naturally occurring compound in wheat, and has been an essential part of bread for thousands of years.
FODMAPS which...includes wheat. So the people who thought they had a gluten intolerance actually had a wider food issue which included wheat as one of the triggers.
Also, the process of milling cannot be described as cooking by any reasonable defintion of the word, so I'm not sure what you mean by wheat being "raw" in a way that flour is not. Unless you count finely chopped ingredients as no longer being "raw".
I would also add that, by this definition, any animal product eaten is processed - even eggs - which are cracked and then usually cooked. Ground beef is extremely processed - having been butchered and then fed through a grinder.
You can theoretically grow your own wheat and grind your own flour. If you can do it yourself without a food factory and secret ingredients, then I don't think it fits any reasonable definition of 'processed'.
In my mind grinding is processing. It is being processed so we can make something something else out of it. Would you eat it on its own?
I broadly wipe that anything that can't be done with ones hands is processed. But that opens the question if cooking meat is considered processing.
I can't see prehistoric man grinding wheat to make a meal.
Cooking meat causes chemical changes - maillard reaction. http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maillard_reaction
Many low tech cultures use carbs obtained from crushing or pulping grains. The reason they don't use wheat is not because of the need for grinding but because of the need for agriculture.
To be pedantic, chemicals are added to fortified and enriched flour... perfectly harmless chemicals that were lost in the milling process.
It's not surprising that people think you're claiming that milling flour is "processing" it, or that you think gluten is a result of whatever people are doing to flour.
Celiac disease, which prevents a small portion of the population, seem to be the only people who outright need to avoid gluten to live - AFAIK there are no studies showing gluten free diets is actually healthier on a while for humans.
My assumption is that you cannot make bread without milling the wheat to produce flour. Thus processed.
I believe you are correct there are no hard studies. But I did scan a report that said removing gluten from schizophrenic patient diets reduce symptoms.
1) If wheat wasn't part of white people food for many centuries, and as a thought experiment it was invented in 2014, there's no way possible that the FDA / USDA would approve it for human consumption and stick it on the GRAS list. In other words the only reason we tolerate it in a world that bans red M+M food coloring etc is because it got grandfathered in. Not because its good or good enough.
2) In processed foods its always an empty calorie or bulk-ing substance. You cannot remove wheat from your diet and die of "wheat-deficiency disease" like happens if you try to remove all Vitamin C from your diet. If starvation was a serious medical problem in America I'd say taking twinkies away from the skinnies would be a pretty dumb idea, but in a nation of people dying from being too fat, a dietary substance that has no redeeming value other than empty calories and making farmers and food processors wealthy is a pretty tempting target to imagine banning. Corn can/should pretty much just go away for similar reasoning.
If as a hard sci fi novel you imagine space aliens or terrorists dropped a genetically engineered virus that wiped out corn and wheat, aside from short term shortages the only real effect is Americans would have a healthier weight and longer life. Not exactly a stellar endorsement for a foodstuff that its only real purpose is to make most of us fat and dead and a few of us wealthy.
Gluten is a protein composite found in wheat and related
grains, including barley and rye.
and: The stored proteins of maize and rice are sometimes
called glutens, but their proteins differ from true
gluten.
Which is sort of confusing, because you also have [Glutinous Rice][2].However, if you're looking for a purely diet-based solution to GI problems, given that cutting gluten out of your diet will also cut out fructans, then you might as well go ahead with that. Especially as people serving you food will know what you're talking about, as opposed to going "huh?" if you start asking about their fructan-free offerings.
OTOH, if we try to deglutenate[1] foods in some way, or develop some kind of enzyme in pill form (glutase?)[1], than that's not going to help people who are actually fructan-sensitive rather than gluten-sensitive.
[0] http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/a-balanced-look-at-glute...
[1] Is this a word?
[2] cf. lactase
Less than 1% of the population is thought to have gluten intolerance by most studies.
From all this, you've determined that gluten is bad....because why exactly? Because it is 'processed'? We're not talking about high fructose corn syrup here, we're talking about crushing a seed and using the various products.
This anti-food information worries me as it seems to be spreading like anti-vaccination hysteria.