Linux kernel swear counts per version

I just got 'Gnuplot in Action' (http://amzn.com/1933988398), and it's been fantastic so far. I do plan to check out matplotlib one of these days though.

I still use gnuplot, and it frustrates me enormously. But I still know it far better than any other scriptable graphing option, and it's free, so I suffer it.

My physics teacher used gnuplot, and he taught us how to use it then required it for plotting homework solutions it really doesn't look so bad and in many situations I think it looks so much better than excel generated graphs.

I used gnuplot for the charts in my recent paper originally, but we switched to Excel for the latest version.

EDIT: my advisor likes it better, and it actually makes really pretty graphs.

hehe. Graphs look an awful lot nicer when you use the pdf terminal with it. Gotta love that anti-aliasing.

R (http://www.r-project.org/) draws really nice graphs - in case you want something scripted that is better looking than Gnuplot, and less hideous than Excel.

I know they removed a lot of crufty older code around that time, but I don't remember if it corresponded exactly.

I noticed that and wanted to make a joke that they probably removed a subsystem, and it took about five "fucks" worth of effort to do so.

But upon further reflection, I think that's probably the first occurrence of 2.5.x. That was an experimental version, and probably had lots of old subsystems removed, and a few smaller (but soon to grow) ones in place of them. (It was "experimental" in that the 2.5 kernels weren't supposed to be a part of any distribution. It eventually grew into the more mature 2.6.)

Besides some penguins being subjected to imprisonment in arch/sparc64/kernel/smp.c I can't find anything that would qualify.