Google Cracks Down on Android Developer, Offers Olive Branch
wired.com
wired.com
1. Google released all of the Android Operating System as open source. Everyone is welcome to modify and redistribute it.
2. There are some Google-developed applications that are closely tied to Google services. While these applications are freely available from the Android Market, they are proprietary, non-opensource, Google branded applications. Some of these applications come bundled with some Android-enabled phones (most notably, the G1) but they are not part of the Android system.
3. Some guy who made an (otherwise very good quality) modified Android distribution also distributed these proprietary apps with his distribution without having a permission to do that from Google.
4. I believe that companies have the right to protect their brands. Clearly Google wouldn't want its brand associated with anything not under its control.
The faux pas is that they apparently took a heavy-handed, lawyer-oriented approach to it, sending a cease-and-desist letter to a popular, well-regarded open-source hacker doing work on a platform that Google has promoted for its openness, who may not have even realized previously that what he was doing wouldn't be acceptable to Google.
Being in the right (both legally and ethically) doesn't make you immune to PR screwups.
Google should be willing to support people who support their platform in my opinion. Why not have the lead of the Android team approach him and offer him a trimmed down marketplace application (or the old version), and then sell the "google experience" through that store allowing you to upgrade your phone as need be?
Support the community that supports you I say.
Kudos to the Android engineers for working around the lawyers on this one.