I've read about 80% of the first page and scrolled the rest of it. Nowhere it seemed as if anything in the article talks about lone geniuses being overrated. Why choose such a title?
100 times this. I excitedly read the article expecting a clear concise explanation ( albeit one with bad premises ) explaining how lone geniuses only accomplish things through others, and that they can be done without. The article fails to deliver on this title entirely.