Frankly, this hospital mismanaged the index patient from the beginning and though the woman infected now wasn't on the initial list...the list itself wasn't complete because they didn't properly diagnose the index patient ebola to begin with.
[1] http://www.cbsnews.com/news/cdc-chief-on-second-ebola-case-t...
"Only 15 BSL-4 facilities were identified in the U.S. in 2007, including nine at federal labs."
There are 4 hospitals in the nation that have a total of less than 20 beds that are set up for diseases like this. Emory (CDC), the NIH in Bethesda, the biggest with 10 beds is in Omaha, Nebraska, and there's one in Missoula, Montana, not far from one of those BSL4 labs.
3 at Emory: http://www.emory.edu/EMORY_REPORT/erarchive/2005/July/July%2...
3 in Montana, and they've never used them or put their protocols to the test: http://missoulian.com/news/local/st-patrick-hospital-of-site...
7 at the NIH, and it sounds like they've gotten some use: http://clinicalcenter.nih.gov/translational-research-resourc...
As mentioned before, 10 in Nebraska, and they don't have a BSL-4 lab handy; hopefully they have, or are setting up, a mini-lab there, for as Emory realized, it's not practical to send samples from Ebola patients to the hospital's main lab: http://www.nebraskamed.com/biocontainment-unit