AT&T Goes After Google Voice
techcrunch.com
techcrunch.com
This is the danger of increasing regulation; the blade cuts both ways. You may think that Net Neutrality is about taking on big companies, but I guarantee that in just a few short years their smart legal teams will be using the regulation to increase each other's legal bills and to squash smaller competitors [1].
[1] Regulation is similar in this regard to patents. The defense of patents is always the hypothetical small inventor. In practice, though, the beneficiary always seems to be huge corporations (except for patent trolls, which are a fairly recent innovation).
I don't get how price or underlying technology figure in this. Almost all of the end-users won't see the difference between one system for making phonecalls and another, and I'm sure the rules are meant to protect exactly those people.
If something is completely free, it should not have to follow as many rules as paid services that are built upon government infrastructure.
One good reason for that is that sometimes corporations will give away stuff and make money some other way. It would be bad(TM) if that allowed them to work around laws they don't like.
In this case that answer probably depends on who you ask.
Maybe it was AT&T all along blocking the iPhone app, as the executives probably have used Google VOice or use it and know it's a killer app. Well for me it is.