> they're not exactly adhering to the license as they should
Correct me if I'm wrong, but the licenses don't require Apple to proactively publish sources, they just need to be able to supply them upon request.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but the licenses don't require Apple to proactively publish sources, they just need to be able to supply them upon request.
Accompany it with a written offer, valid for at least three years, to give any third party, for a charge no more than your cost of physically performing source distribution, a complete machine-readable copy of the corresponding source code, to be distributed under the terms of Sections 1 and 2 above on a medium customarily used for software interchange; or,
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/gpl-2.0-faq.html#Wh...
Source is not distributed along with their binaries nor is a written offer to receive source code that I've seen. http://support.apple.com/kb/DL1761 & http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-violation.html