Your friends are lying to you. For $10, I wont.
brutalhonesty.io
brutalhonesty.io
I imagine myself paying $10 and asking "hey, what do you think of my outfit tonight?" And he would kindly inform me that my chances of scoring (or whatever they call it these days) wearing these sandals, hiking pants (pull these zippers and they become shorts!) and grey kinda stretched-out long-sleeve t-shirt are next to zero. But my Friday night activity was going out with my wife, toddler & 5-year-old to have dinner with a bunch of retired English expats in the middle of nowhere in central France. I sat next to a guy who was a large-scale industrial engineer back in the 70s -- extracting helium & natural gas in communist Poland, in Iran when the Shah fell... And my little ones had great fun racing around and then choosing the winning tickets for the lottery.
But: there are plenty of people in this world (or at least in the more Californian parts of this world) who share his particular little slice of the human experience, who are a bit less far along than he is, perhaps, in figuring out who they are and who they want to be, and who have not yet built any meaningful friendships.
(It seems like it should go without saying: if you have built a meaningful relationship with someone who cares about you and has a bit of wisdom, they will find a way to tell you the things you need to know with no brutality required. You will also do this for them.)
That said, I just bought my advice, paid but I still don't see email. Damn.
Could you send me an email directly at brutalhonestyio@gmail.com? I'll get to yours next :)
For $10, he isn't going to send you a 5 word email and ignore you forever. He is going to have a reasonable dialogue pertaining to your question/concern. If you say "No bro, I am not looking to score" he will ask "OK, well what are your intentions? What is your actual concern with your outfit?"
But there are people who could seek him out as someone a bit further along than they are, on a similar path, plus some market for people who'll try it for fun.
I'd wager that there a lot of people out there that ultimately do not have such friendships. A lot of people have poor self-esteem and surround themselves with crappy, dishonest, alike people. The idea here is that some of those exact people will have just the amount self-actualization that you need to email this guy. Hopefully this guy is willing and ready to meet these people more than half way and do his best to empathize.
I realize that I just issued a lot of insults to a group of people I explicitly said I do not belong to. Self-acceptance is a great thing to encourage and facilitate though. I wonder if that's this guy's intention...
RainSunshine, you registered at HN today and have posted only on this post and nowhere else, speaking with high confidence about how a random person on the Internet will respond to specific example questions.
What is your relation to Jordan and/or this site?
Nice enlightened example.
this is an update on the concept of "my 2 cents", with the difference being...
...he has adjusted for inflation, with a markup.
I imagine you meant to include at least a modicum of detail to establish the context of your question to get any value out of your $10; or maybe you just wanted [to imagine] the exchange to be frustrating.
If we met in a social situation, we could probably find something to talk about; but we'd not be paying either other for that.
I doubt the service would be valuable if he were offering advice on subjects you're already comfortable judging for yourself.
About your website/app/resume/outfit.
You need to know the truth.
How can you afford to not know?
Those sources vary depending on the subject, but they probably won't be "someone I don't know, from the internet" either, unless he happens to have that specific expertise and you have a common need.
Website/app/resume: for me this just equates to "how is the business doing", and I don't ask friends; this is what data is for. There's a possible conflict of interest here with our CEO (my primary source of truth for financial status), because he wants to motivate the company (and hence generally add a positive spin); but he's also well-aware that transparency & trust are far more important than any temporarily gain from faked positivity.
Outfit: sure, appearances matter in life & work. But I have better sources of truth here as well than "ask a friend"; hello again CEO/founder, for one. We talk about what we're wearing if that's going to be relevant, and (more likely) how we're speaking on phone calls, and what can be better. Think he's honest? Well, he'd be a fool not to be.
But most of the time my wardrobe only matters to the extent that my wife feels I'm appropriately dressed if we're out in public, and she's perfectly capable of pointing it out if I've misjudged. It's just "oh hey, don't forget we're going out to dinner before we come back home tonight", and that works.
I won't be snarky here, but will suggest a news story of related interest. Journalist A. J. Jacobs turned on his full sense of humor as well as his honesty when he wrote a story for Esquire magazine in 2007 about the "radical honesty" movement. The story's title gets him started: "I Think You're Fat."[1] When I read this story the first time, right after it was published, I laughed out loud and immediately shared it with my favorite online group of friends (this was pre-Facebook, for me). I shared it with a new group of friends this summer, and found out that they like the story too. Try it. I think you'll like it.
A guy who could take the business idea proposed in this thread and execute it with as much humor as A. J. Jacobs could become a millionaire.
I guess I form part of this "radical honesty" movement. Once you learn to trick your mind out of lying it's so refreshing. Lying is extremely stressful, I have no idea why we have a natural tendency to employ it.
Instead of worrying if my wife finds out I've lied about drinking with colleagues ("I'm working late"), I know that I can ask her to fetch me if I go over the limit.
Although, there's a difference between being honest and being a dick.
They also didn't deal with the question of people who were honest but mistaken--how would dispute resolution work in a world where everyone in the world was telling the truth, but no one in the world had a very good idea of what the truth actually is? And so on.
It was a one-joke movie that could have been a much deeper look at how lying and our strategies for detecting and dealing with lying are embedded into our every social interaction, including those that apparently have very little to do with it. And it could have been incredibly funny, instead of just kind of meh.
We were even written up in the Houston press: http://www.houstonpress.com/2007-10-11/news/night-of-terror/...
I'm a counselor, and going into the field I naively thought that straightforward evaluative statements were central to what therapists did. I thought that what people needed was "objective" feedback on their situations, and I thought myself ideally suited to providing it.
You can imagine my shock when I found out that "direct, reality-oriented feedback" is one of the most ineffective forms of intervention, and leads to a significant rise in client dropout. In other words, people don't like to be judged, however politely or compassionately, and it doesn't help them (1). People need love, not honesty - especially when they are going through troubles which are likely already causing them to question themselves.
The one exception is, as jtheory noted above, within the context of an already established attachment relationship, in which mutual respect and affiliation is already firmly in place.
In general, the best interventions are those which, rather than telling the client "what they need to hear", compassionately lead them towards the acceptance of what they more than likely already know. But it must come from the person themselves, and in their own time - that alone is what damns or saves.
Addendum: The research also reflects my experience. My internship was as a career counselor at a university and the most common client I saw were students about to graduate (often with little to no work experience) expecting to immediately get prestigious/lucrative jobs. I remember one philosophy major in particular who stopped by to see me 3 months before she graduated, whose only work experience was as a manager of a strip club and who wanted a 60k + job writing children's books right after she graduated. I told her, as kindly as I possibly could, that her expectations were more than likely unrealistic. Not only did I tell her but I sat with her and searched through the job ads for the position she wanted so she could see for herself what the requirements were for those positions. She left in a huff and I never saw her again. In fact, not a single client with whom I took a "brutally honest" approach did I ever see again. However, when I took a questioning approach, the difference was night and day.
(1) http://mobile.williamwhitepapers.com/pr/2007ConfrontationinA...
Most therapy manuals are awful though - and so much of my progress since then has been helped along by reading bios or analysis's of the greats in the field, and adapting their methods to match my personality. It's very much an art and not a science - and my progress has been determined as much by my self-knowledge and the strength of the integration between my conception of life and my practice as my knowledge of specific methods of inquiry.
So all that to say I don't have much - although you've motivated me to look around for it. Feel free to drop me a line so I can share when I find something.
It is not exactly the same situation, but if you treat that person as someone who needs to learn something about herself that she didn't realise (or refused to accept), it might be very similar.
Here is a video explaining it with a bit more details: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n3G0V7Wthbc
Hope this helps.
I've definitely been able to help a few people out based on limited feedback I've received. However, I get the sense that most of the people whom I haven't heard back from (around 75%) probably aren't too thrilled with the brutal honesty. I've been very compassionate, but still. This comment definitely hits home.
They don't really make much(/any?) money or involve cool tech, but I think they are fun, and good times. Maybe I'll get working on the one I've been wanting to do most.
Man: Well, Well, I was told outside that...
Angry man: DON'T GIVE ME THAT, YOU SNOTTY-FACED HEAP OF PARROT DROPPINGS!
Man: What?
A: SHUT YOUR FESTERING GOB, YOU TIT! YOUR TYPE MAKES ME PUKE! YOU VACUOUS TOFFEE-NOSED MALODOROUS PERVERT!!!
M: Yes, but I came here for an argument!!
A: OH! Oh! I'm sorry! This is abuse!
M: Oh! Oh I see!
A: Aha! No, you want room 12A, next door.
M: Oh...Sorry...
A: Not at all!
A: (under his breath) stupid git.
I came up with the idea because I wanted to use such a service, but when I couldn't find anything I figured I'd create it and thought it would be fun. Most importantly I want to help people out - the $10 is so I can (somewhat) justify it from a time perspective. So far it turns out I'm spending a lot of time on each request, but that's fine because I'm enjoying it.
I'm really appreciating the snark as well!
See what I did there :P
Brutal honesty: nothing here leads me to believe that Jordan's feedback is any more useful than the feedback of a random person on the street. The fact that Jordan is only charging $10 and hasn't focused his offering on an area of interest where he has demonstrable experience and expertise leads me to believe that Jordan himself doesn't think his feedback is very valuable.
If I pay for honest feedback I'd like to get it from someone who is not exactly like me.
And your whole assumption gives me the impression that you are a ridiculously superficial person.
It wasn't my intention to use 'bro' as a derogatory term.
To me, his bio says "I am a pretty average guy, with above average intelligence. I am the guy you are trying to impress at the bar, I am your bro who never invites you to the gym, I am in the front row of your concert."
What kind of a stranger could give me actual answers to those questions?
I can imagine a few good (applicable) answers to someone who'd pay ten dollars to email someone those questions... but I can't imagine any answers that are actually worth than ten bucks.
/r/subredditdrama
It's full of self-righteous people who enjoy watching other people fight. On the other hand, they tend to be people who are less interested in fighting and rather enjoy engaging conversation. I've had some brilliant belief-altering discussions in there, and most importantly, situations where both parties "respectfully agree to disagree."
You just have to find the sweet spots in Reddit - it takes a fair amount of participation to finds those places (but SRD is a good start).
This is a bad idea. Fine, you pay $10 for someone's honest opinion, but it's just one person's opinion, you really want to consult multiple sources to get a balanced view, otherwise you could make a bad decision based on another person being in a shitty mood (for whatever reason).
Plus, I find friends will be honest with you if you expressly give them permission to be, and promise not to take it personally.
But if he makes money from giving people unqualified advice on random subjects, good for him I guess.
Plus, like vlunkr said, I don't know the guy, if I wanted the honest feedback of random strangers I can already get that for free on the Internet. It's not exactly like brutal honesty is in short supply, and if you target the right places it can be articulate as well.
Pitch: Bringing experts and non-experts together, making non-experts feel bad and sucky.
(unless you're sending [unsolicited?] private messages there)
Maybe I'm lucky enough to have these friends, but this week I asked multiple friends and one person who I don't know that well about my current situation and they told me things like "You are really stupid you did that!" or "Get your shit together!", or "Do something already you idiot!". (Not joking or something, these were they actual, serious answers to me on the topic.) I don't know how could I get more honest opinion than these.
Also I think your best friends care enough to tell you the truth, and your responsibility should be also to tell them if you care enough! Yes, sometimes it's hard. One of my best friend says me things all the time which hurt my feelings very badly, but he always adds "I don't say this because I want to hurt you, but because I want the best for you.". He shouldn't say that because I know his intent and he is one of my best friend for more than 10 years now, even though he is brutal. :) Another example when I complained years ago to another friend about something, she told me how I dare to feel that way, I should feel lucky, I have a lot of friends and that's just stupid to worry about something like what I told her. She shocked me with her opinion but the more I think about it, the more I think she was right and I never heard an opinion like that before. We were very good friends at the time also!
The only "Warrior One" I can locate is a coaching firm for lawyers, with no one named Jordan listed on their about page [3] as a member of staff.
I've asked this Warrior One on Twitter [4] if they are the actual owner of the site, and will reply here if they respond.
[1] which implies that either a DBA filing exists for that name, or no such name exists
[2] "I reserve the right to transfer your personally identifiable information, as well as any other information, in connection with the sale or other disposition of all or part of Warrior One’s business, assets, or both."
[3] http://www.warriorone.com/our-story/
[4] https://twitter.com/floatingatoll/status/520745627278270465
The Saga of Denko and Her Stalker.
http://vgperson.tumblr.com/post/21533650696/help-the-girl-i-...
Question: "Would you like a million dollars?"
"Thoughtful reply": "Yes."
Assuming he is an honest actor in this process he can't share your submission with anyone as then they wouldn't be private. It is specified that it is he, Jordan, who will email you, he will say how he feels.
It could have been set up differently to allow for scaling but part of the drawn I think is that it's a real, named and identifiable, individual that you are contacting.
Of course "Jordan" could be a made up person and this could be a way to gather information for social manipulation or straight-out blackmail, but you know ...
I've long thought about the differences in scalability and margins when comparing service-based businesses to product-based ones.
In the ad agency world, it is all service-based for the most part still, margins are razor thin, pay is low, and the stress is massive. The problem then becomes maintaining quality of service as you scale, and efficiency of operations to keep your margins as healthy as possible. Stressed out service employees are basically the equivalent of delivering a shitty product. If it becomes a big enough loss in quality, you lose customers.
Or somewhere in between, more likely.
If they're not being brutally honest with me, it's typically for a good reason, and they'll do it on request.
I have no idea how a random software engineer on the other side of the world is going to be useful in regards to giving me brutally honest advice without seeing any perspective but my own (the only information he will have to go off is what I tell him).
Would you pay (amount) for (product/app/service)?
Do you like my app? (web/iOS only, for now)
Does my landing page look professsional?
Getting one guy's opinion about any of these things is anecdotal at best. It's not a comprehensive information source. And it would be foolish to use it in your decision making process.
There's better ways to collect data:
1) Spend that $10 towards an adword campaign for a pre-launch signup page for you website/app idea. Maybe this guy won't sign up, but maybe a dozen, a hundred or a thousand other people will. Why waste your money on one data point?
2) Put the money to buying beer. Invite your friends and family over, get them liquored up a bit. I guarantee you'll hear a great deal of honest feedback.
3) Post on HN, reddit, slashdot or any other number of web sites where armchair cynics freely administer scathing advice.
-----------------------------
Hey there,
Thanks for buying Brutal Honesty. What can I help you with? Ask away.
Cheers
Jordan
-----------------------------
And then this is my reply:
-----------------------------
Hi Jordan,
So I was hoping to get your honest opinion on a business idea I'm working on. It's a bit similar to your business I guess.
Here's our site:
Let me know if you think this seems like total bullshit, or if it's cool.
Thanks!
-Alex
One thing I've noticed as a freelance developer is that people are more willing to commit to per project contracts rather than hourly. I wonder if that's the case with a service such as yours where it's a one time deal.
You have a broken link:
But I don't think this is a problem that can be solved by ordinary people, and AI is nowhere close yet. Perhaps there's room in the world for Psychopaths-as-a-Service.
You mean "Ethan": http://www.textethan.com/
I saw it here, and I've been mentoring there quite successfully, although I haven't had any clients with really advanced questions yet, only beginners. I am looking forward to helping people with hard design issues.
For those that missed it: http://www.producthunt.com/posts/ethan and https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8434045
1. UX, Design: Dribble, Behance 2. Code : Stack Overflow 3. High Level Architecture questions: Stack Exchange 4. Business Idea etc : HN, Reddit, Quora 5. Miscellaneous other questions: HN, Reddit, Quora etc
Then just scan through the flood of indignant response/corrections.
I still believe this is vote manipulation, though.
Normally, Hacker News detects and penalizes stupid upvote rigging. I'm curious how the OP bypassed it at such a scale.
Actually, judging by the ridiculous number of flags the post has also gotten, I think he just touched a nerve.
> Can I ask people to upvote my submission?
> No. Users should vote for a story because it's intellectually interesting, not because someone is promoting it.
> When the software detects a voting ring, it penalizes the post. Accounts that vote like this eventually get their votes ignored.
That's what I would say ;)
But I do believe you, without reading your comment. I just liked the idea and upvoted. I'm extremely curious about how many people actually do this though. I'm sure we could crowdsource $10 on HN to learn those stats, say, a week from today ;)
Some (all?) sample questions can be answered with yes or no. I know that you mention a conversation at the top but you might want to make it a bit more clear that your feedback will be more than yes or no.
There is already an army of unpaid critics working around the clock on HN and Reddit.
2. Brutal Outfit Advice
Pay to get brutally honest feedback on your outfit. Give commission to (vetted) critics.
Alternative name: What Would You Think? (http://startupideas.posthaven.com/2-brutal-outfit-advice - now defunct blog)
Good to see someone do executing on it. Good luck!
Silicon Valley capitalizes on "penny for your thoughts"
A: A contractor knows the difference.
Perhaps 5 bucks would be better, but considering an hourly wage and how much time I take to write stuff myself, ten bucks is not unreasonable. Also consider that, assuming this is a business (or could be), he's taking risk because there is no subscription or recurring payment whatsoever. I imagine this being a very variable business. If it would make a business in the first place.
Stupidity rules for ever.. ..the people who do it, and the people who buy it..
Please, send your valuable money to the people suffering real poverty, you might save some children from sexual abuse and raise your soul.
Dude, the fact you propose this seriously, gives me the only answer I need from you.
no need..
I know that type.