Django gaining or Rails waning?
trends.google.com
trends.google.com
Considering my Rails work: I visited rubyonrails.org only once, when I first heard about it - it's primary focus isn't as a resource site and I don't know any other Rails developers that use it as one.
Considering my Django work: I had djangoproject.com open practically all the time, every day, since it's a primary destination for everything related to the project.
But I tried putting api.rubyonrails.org and apparently that also falls under the rubyonrails.org domain which I use quite a bit for rails dev.
As for the microframeworks, I'm with you. I don't build apps in Rails from day 1 anymore, I generally use Sinatra instead and sometimes (for smaller apps) there ends up being no reason to switch to Rails.
Really, HN should be above this inanity.
That shortened URL and generic name got me. :(
Obviously, Rails and Django are also at different points on the hype cycle.
I remember when it was launched that it had some hype as it was touted as a Rails alternative, but earlier versions like 0.95 were awful anyway.
It's a cool framework though. I like the plugins available.
Also, rails.com is not as much a destination page as django.com. Most rails programmers rely on books to learn it and use API docs that are hosted on third party pages.
Note also that according to the trends graph, djangoproject's visitors have also been steadily declining over the past year.
Why can't we all enjoy the differences and enjoy them for different reasons? Do we spread ourselves too thin when we bounce around learning the basics of different frameworks? Or are we simply stocking our utility belt with more solutions to problems?
http://trends.google.com/websites?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.djangop...
Update: Yes, I know it's a rough estimate, and if you can find a way to do a more refined filter on Google Trends, please share it and make us all the wiser. "Python Django" doesn't provide good results for comparison.
Update (2): Filtered out some of the noise: http://trends.google.com/trends?q=django+-restaurant,+%22rub... -- still looking for a way to exclude the musician from results
Django the framework wasn't released until 2005. So if you assume the level of searches for "other django's" is consistent then about half of django's traffic isn't for the framework. You can almost tell when the framework was released by the upward trend in the graph.
Of course this is with a very rough visual analysis ;-P
That looks more realistic, but there's still a significant amount of noise pre-2005, which is when Django was released according to Wikipedia.
If you mentally subtract the fairly steady amount of traffic pre-2005, you'd have a pretty accurate estimate I would guess.
Regardless of how interesting the trends could be, there is still too much noise to draw any meaningful conclusion. (And yes, I also search "rails" not "ruby on rails" when left on my own.
http://trends.google.com/trends?q=ruby+rails%2C+django+pytho...
Rails slacking off, particularly as it gets more mature and in the middle of the Rails 3 refactoring. Django gaining some steam.
I will say, in san fran at most of the recent startup-y events i have attended rails has been far more represented than django. now this isn't scientific either by any stretch ...just a sense from real world engagement.