Mint.com Founder: Heck No, My VCs Didn't Force Me To Sell To Intuit
businessinsider.com
businessinsider.com
Enough said, really.
Pretty sure I said exactly that here. Seemed fairly obvious that either it was a fire sale or some VCs would have preferred going for more.
Probably what I'd not considered is that no VC wants to be in the position of blocking an exit of a company still run by the founders.
If he negotiated really well his early round, it could be 15%.
Also, keep in mind that if he owns 10%, it doesn't mean he got $17M (10% of $170M). VCs who invested money may have preference rights. For instance, if they put $20M in Mint, they could take the $20M out of the purchase price. Then, there is only $150M to share, and that's what Aaron would get 10% of.
Either way, he's fine :-)
"Patzer says he does not have an earnout, but is on contract with Intuit for three years."
After MintRunning Quicken/Online will be like being neck deep in quicksand and trying to run. But I guess one can suffer sme boring meetings (Intuit is big on meetings) for 3 years for this kind of money.
Is 17 million (assuming a 10% share for him) worth three years at Intuit? I think so, at his age. (He'd be 31 when he is free again).
He just sold for $170 million and buying a house is crazy?
He's a smart man. Congratulations Aaron. Good work.