Microsoft Unveils New Operating System, Dubbed Windows 10
wired.com
wired.com
Is there some new paradigm in marketing circles where giving a product a confusing name is believed to increase sales?
Or worse, the SunOS renaming fiasco, where SunOS was also concurrently Solaris. So that SunOS 4.1.1 was also Solaris 1.0. Except that, crazily, so was SunOS 4.1.1.1.
Eventually, SunOS 4.1.4 (aka Solaris 1.1.2) was the last of the old BSD-based SunOS line and Solaris 2.0 came out, which was mostly SysV and different enough that most everybody started calling it Solaris. (Except that `uname` still reported SunOS 5, of course.)
And then everything was sane again. At least until Solaris 2.7, aka SunOS 5.7, which they started calling Solaris 7.
So, Microsoft has a ways to go before the names are completely ridiculous. (ObDisclaimer: Microsoft employee.)
Ceasing to be meaningful is not the same as being ridiculous. Remember the Windows XP family lineup? From Starter Edition, Home, Professional, Ultimate and all the Server editions?
If Microsoft is targeting people who care about kernel version numbers in their marketing strategy, they're even more off base than I thought.
It seems that HN does not like Windows, which is sad I think. It's a great operating system (currently running 8.1, which is very good). I'm waiting for the resizable metro-apps to be honest. Full screen just doesn't do it on my 27" screen.
And that's not even mentioning how many of our customers run Windows (or personal tastes aside).
It also represents an interesting take on the convergence of mouse, keyboard, and touch as opposed to trying to force touch interactions on everyone.
They may not be news that you care about, but that's a different issue.