Don't tell me you would happily sitting and eating next to someone with confirmed ebola for 8 hours plus, because they haven't started showing symptoms at that very moment.
I would at the very least go to a doctor to be sure.
Don't tell me you would happily sitting and eating next to someone with confirmed ebola for 8 hours plus, because they haven't started showing symptoms at that very moment.
I would at the very least go to a doctor to be sure.
They departed on the 19th of September, arrived on the 20th, showed first symptoms on the 24th, sought care on the 26th, were admitted to the hospital and isolated on the 28th.
As the Director emphasised again and again, Ebola is only transmittable when you are showing symptoms. There is only the window between the 24th and 28th when the patient with Ebola could have realistically infected anyone, so people travelling along with them aren’t affected. Any people they did have contact with will be monitored for the next 21 days.
4 days loose is quite a reasonable amount of time to infect others. If they had been using public transport or being in densely populated events e.g. attending a concert/conference it could be quite a lot. I guess we wont know for a couple of weeks. Here's to a functioning health system, a bit of luck.
Only after it already happened they confirm if it is safe.
On a global safety issue it isn't a problem, but on an individual level, it is scary.
The passengers were screened for fever before boarding the plane. On the individual level there are thousands of better things to worry about.
I can't immediately find a source for your claim that sneezing is the "primary means" of transmission - can you provide one?
Though apparently this person wasn't infectious at the time as has been pointed out.
--WHO
You're not the first nor the last to be tripped up by that. Airborne means that the pathogen can survive for some time in extremely small droplets. If you are sitting right next to someone with a non-airborne pathogen you have two problems. First, you will be reached by bigger droplets. Second, virus in very small droplets will only be in that condition very briefly before reaching you, and wont have sufficient time to die.
http://www.pathogenperspectives.com/2014/08/debunking-airbor...
I'm not saying it's likely to infect you, I'm saying this would cause personal distress, even if it is unlikely or impossible.