Was originally going to post "Well that's a big fat 'DUH!!!!'", but then I thought better.
It's good to have studies to back up these sorts of things that typically get treated as common sense.
It's good to have studies to back up these sorts of things that typically get treated as common sense.
>Daphna Baratz exposed college students to pairs of supposed findings, one true ("In prosperous times people spend a larger portion of their income than during a recession") and one the truth's opposite. In both sides of the pair, students rated the supposed finding as what they "would have predicted". Perfectly standard hindsight bias.
>Which leads people to think they have no need for science, because they "could have predicted" that.
Much of Quantum Mechanics is also counter intuitive but true, while some scientific concepts can only be expressed through mathematics and have no simple intuitive explanation.
That it's especially beneficial toward children with ADHD is not common sense at all.
What if it was less beneficial and so they needed more exercise than the average child? That would also be a perfectly reasonable result.