'One million babies' created by EU student exchanges
yahoonewsdigest-intl.tumblr.com
yahoonewsdigest-intl.tumblr.com
Here's a site with a better summary (http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-14-1025_en.htm) where you can download the PDF of the report. The executive summary contains some interesting facts.
"Erasmus Impact Study confirms EU student exchange scheme boosts employability and job mobility"
The part about "1 million babies" is buried several paragraphs in as random statistic, but the author turns the entire story over and runs with that as the lead.
I think the submission should be changed to the EU report, as it's far more informative than the blog re-write, and has less of a smelly spin to it.
All things considered, this is one of those positive headlines we so rarely see these days.
Stable population might be a good thing, but rapid declining is very problematic. And that's where some countries are headed.
What a bizarre logic.
Your only chance would be getting out of country, and this may not be easy in senior age.
It's like nobody ever watched Wall-E.
Your nurse will have to pay like 90% tax, but this way you can never afford to hire her in the first place. The whole thing breaks down. Our economy taxes individual profits, because corporations evade taxes; but then if nobody has to work, we can't have revenue from taxes and can't pay anyone anything.
But if we don't have enough children we don't know what happens. Maybe it is "pushed to adopt". Maybe it implodes. Who knows.
I happened to be born in the USSR. And then it failed to "change to adapt" and instead imploded on us into something as bad as two Great Depressions. Today I won't count on this adaptability business and I don't recommend anyone to do so.
As for hard-working older folks who vote. The problem here is older folks who don't work but still vote. They vote themself a lot of socialism that taxes everybody else and also makes it counterproductive for hard-working older folts to work, since they get benefits anyway, which might be cancelled if they continue to work.
That's the gist of it.
In other news: we still have to heat our homes, grow our food and build things from stuff we dig out of ground.
Europe could trivially make up any population decline by changing immigration policies. Right now, thousands of people are drowning every year trying to cross the Mediterranean. Most laments about European population decline seem to really be concerned about a decline in white Europeans when you get down to it.
And of course I would want Europe to stay Europe, not caliphat. I assume Europeans do too.
Overpopulation.
20th century Europe is what happens when people fight among each other. If we can reduce that, we should.
And I'm not sure this program affects nationalism between locals and immigrants. It may do so, since a lot of university students are immigrants. But on the other hand, it is also true if you study locally.
1.en: http://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/sites/default/files/st...
1.de: http://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/sites/default/files/gl...
When I talk to people here about the problem of discrimination in the education system few believe it at first. A stalwart all people here hold is that their education system is "great". The stats even for the general population, not accounting for different classes or races, brings that into stark question. Until you relay to them the stories then they start consider it more closely. Then they may start to see that the Gymnasium system meant to promote excellence is actually just a Cast system. Being that promotion to Gymnasium is dependent on a letter from a students teacher. If nothing else tacit discrimination a result of the natural psychology to favor the familiar helps found unfair results.
Prior to the Information Era the Gymnasium / Hauptschule system had a function as professional labor was highly valued. This is no longer the case and not getting into a Gymnasium has stronger psychological effect than it would have before. This system, for this era, is discriminatory at its base.
Consider The Pygmaliom Effect [1] (aka self-fulfilling prophesy) that proves measured aptitude is dependent on confidence and attention within the education system. Here in Germany you have a system that reaffirm the predefined bias against immigrants and you don't give them attention so they don't perform as well.
At least in Berlin, there is evidence that teachers and headmasters of Gymnasiums are just blatantly racist. Consider the arguments some made against Affirmative Action for Gymnasium enrollment in 2011 [2]:
Headmasters have objected, saying this type of policy would be
"a disservice" to poor children, that they would not be able
to keep up academically. The headmasters have also expressed
concerns that children of working-class families would not
feel welcome at gymnasien. Wolfgang Harnischfeger, headmaster
of a well-known Berlin gymnasium, has stated:
It can be noticed in children as young as kindergarten
students, that children take after their parents. They
emulate their language, their way of dressing, their way
of spending their free time. Kids from Neukölln [a poor
neighbourhood] would not feel good about themselves if they
had to attend a type of school that mainly serves students
from social classes different from their own. They will
not be able to integrate. Every field day, every school
party will show that".
Effectively this headmaster is saying his school is racist so immigrants wont feel comfortable. The situation is not going to get better. In 2011 Berlin finally reformed their system requiring %30 of seats in Gymnasium be randomly selected. From any angle you look at it, this measure is too little and completely awkward. It doesn't address the ability of teachers to keep qualified students out by not giving them a letter. It doesn't deal with the structure in Gymnasiums that segregate children. It doesn't deal with the problem that very early in your life you are told whether you are worth of University or not.I feel most Europeans want to protect their idea that whatever problems they hear about in the US, that they don't have anything similar. It's convenient and comfortable but absolutely blind.
1: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pygmalion_effect#Rosenthal.E2....
But for a more serious example: Just ask any European how they feel about gypsies.
If europeans were intolerant to other european nations, perhaps they'd despise many of them equally and not just one.
You can use Jews as a counterexample, but I hold my point for consideration.
See, it works for the US as well. ;)
And Gypsies can't be "responsible for their sad image" as a whole because nobody is responsible for their ethnicity. Responsibility for prejudice lies at the racists who can't see people as individuals. One aspect might be that Gypsies in general aren't very visible in large parts of Europe except in stories about criminals.
This makes it easier for long-standing stereotypes to stay put because nobody is there to challenge them or give you a different experience than what is passed down through oral tradition.
[1] it roughly means something along the lines of "Don't be so calculative with money, be more generous, don't count pennies"
I know a few people of Gypsy descent, they're assimilated perfectly well into the society we're in (for multiple generations I should add). It is sad when they're confronted with stereotypes about culture they are not defined by, but the only constructive solution to this is changes to said poisonous culture. Do this and prejudice goes away fast.
Nope. Racism is not exactly the same as "hating all other countries/races/ethnicies equally". Even the Nazis* treated different countries differently (treating the jews worse, eastern europeans / slavs very bad, and western europeans bad etc.)
* I think it's OK to discuss the Nazis when talking about the history of inter-european nationalism and wars, goodwins law be damned.
And this has tremendously helped Europe to get past its horrible past where almost each country was fighting against each other in 2 world wars etc into a future where no German will think of a French or British as enemy. But rather as just a guy/gal who happened to grow up in a different part of Europe.
History has also shown us that, even if you have people with the same beliefs, skin color, nationality... etc. they will still find a way to wage war with each other.
But that's simply not true. The USA, for instance, hasn't had significant levels of collective domestic violence since the ethnic cleansings of the 19th century. Western Europe hasn't either since WW2. Compare that to, say, a similar geographic area of similar size in Africa, and it's a world of difference.
Good institutions, civil society, and well-developed property rights reduce violence to a negligible level.
Before World War I many people believed a major European war was impossible. There had been such a long period of peace, and there were arguments that prosperity and economic inter-dependency discouraged it.
Also if you get rid of everything that people waged wars for, not much would be left. People waged wars for freedom, you want to get rid of that?
You might also say that beliefs are the problem, let's just get rid of those, however without believes I would probably find it acceptable to just go and attack your people for your lands and riches.
As you can see there is more to it, and we are just scratching the surface.
Last time I have checked the US, Americans were pretty patriotic, and incidentally fought a war for independence and another one for freedom...
What reduces nationalism or racism is people having jobs and enough money to make hands meet so they dont have time to blame the jew,the arab or the negro. Go ask the greeks,italians or the french if Erasmus babies "reduced nationalism".In France a far right party leader has some serious chanced to be elected as president.The far right is growing in Austria,Germany,Sweden,France,Greece,Holland,Uk and many other countries.
showed that 27 percent of people who took part had met
their current life partner during their stay abroad.
Thirty-three percent of Erasmus students hooked up with
people of a different nationality than their own,
nearly three times the rate of students who had not
travelled.
Obviously to meet people of a different nationality you have greater chance when leaving your own country. Next, there is probably something to meeting their partner suitable for starting a family during a certain period of their life that may coincide with Erasmus. So, not sure this statement or this part of the study means anything at all.I predict that it is not Erasmus that creates jobs, but students who win Erasmus places also win jobs that were already there.
Hooked up is the scientific term now. But in reality it's just human nature to want to couple up, combine that with the romantic notion of being in a different country and you have a fairy tale.