I love the Apple rumors also. "As reported somewhere else, someone said on his blog he believes Apple is 'definitely' working on a tablet." Oh well, that proves it then.
I love the Apple rumors also. "As reported somewhere else, someone said on his blog he believes Apple is 'definitely' working on a tablet." Oh well, that proves it then.
Hmm .. so it may work after all. Weird :-)
That's what a netbooks for, and better than a tablet, you can put it on your lap and have 2 hands free to operate it.
I use my Macbook on the toilet, in bed, on the sofa etc all the time and have never thought "hey I wish this didn't have a keyboard, and I wish I had to hold the screen with one hand and try to type one handed on the other on the screen"
It seems a natural progression from the Iphone, e-book readers with internet connections proved somewhat popular and they have a market ready lined up.
To be honest though I think Arringtons proposed price for the Crunchpad was crazily low (and it seems his initial estimate was too low). That had to be his competitive edge: he cant begin to compete with Apple on brand and I seriously doubt he has the capacity to compete in terms of baseline discount (i.e. how much discount you get for bulk manufacture).
The thing is that I really don't need a keyboard to read a PDF, nor do I need it to browse a couple of dozen of sites I frequent. And this is all I do before going to bed or in the mornings. The CrunchPad-like tablet is not as a replacement for a laptop, it is more of a beefed up (ebook/Internet) reader. Lighter and simpler, both physically and functionally. It doesn't appeal to you - fine, to each his own. But there is a substantial demand for this sort of device, so yay for it.
Not if the manufacturer wants to be profitable.