Startups Democratize Deep Learning So Google and Facebook Don't Own It All
forbes.com
forbes.com
It is sad that so much amazing tech is being used primarily to deliver ads more effectively. Deep learning is not the first, nor will it be the last, technology for which that is the case...but, it doesn't make it any less depressing. I like free markets, but somehow our collective consciousness needs to shift from valuing making money over all other things.
And, it's alarming that many of the most valuable companies primary products are ads. Many companies that make real things (like electric cars and solar panels) are worth vastly less than many of the companies that spit ads about real things at people (like Google and Facebook). Something seems unbalanced about that. It seems so wrong, in fact, that it feels vaguely dangerous, to me, though I can't quite put my finger on why.
At least some of the products of the social media & web advertising era give people access to information and one another, two fundamental human drives. That's a bit better than "better technology to persuade people to buy stuff."
I've seen this a lot, and it's probably true. But because of cuts to research and capitalism's "market failure" as Gates calls it, when it comes to research, does it really matter? The highly motivated and brilliant people will go off into research anyway.
The fault isn't the people of course, it's the markets.
What's critical to understand is that he's not just talking about the minority that is directly working on ad technology. He's talking about everyone who works on an ad-supported website that depends on page views, which is nearly all of them. Since revenue is proportional to page views, the driving concern is to increase page views rather than maximizing end user satisfaction, which only has secondary importance as one factor in page views, and often not the largest factor.
As to the free market, advertising distorts it very badly. The free market is based on consumers voting with their wallets. What happens when the wallets are held by advertisers?
And for what do we accept the above state of affairs? So that we can get content and services for free? Then we are all suckers! It's an absolute lie that ads give us anything for free. It actually makes the web much more expensive: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7485773]
Oh data didn't come back in a clean format? 10 hours gone.
All these text need to be tagged? 2 days
What categories do these images fall under? Another 3 days spent tagging
Wanna parallelize your algorithmn? Ok, good luck learning how to deploy to multiple machines on AWS.
I will pay easily for a service that allows me to run my analysis in parallel without any sysadmin knowledge.
http://blogs.technet.com/b/machinelearning/archive/2014/06/2...
A friend is working on DeepLearning4J (http://deeplearning4j.org/) which is an open source distributed deep learning package.
> In particular, several companies aim to democratize deep learning by offering it as a service or coming up with cheaper hardware to make it more accessible to businesses.
Couldnt spot the "democratization" of AI here (unless democracy only to those that can pay?); also, given the current trends, small interesting startups get acquired by the big ones early.. and we end in big monopolies again..
The only way to runaway from this cycle is open-source.. otherwise we would still using windows XP and IE6 by now
Until good open-source initiatives can happen, we will be lock in the hands of a few forever.. I hope we still have some open-source heroes left out there..
[1]: https://gigaom.com/2014/08/11/gigaom-meetup-talk-learn-and-h...
A "turker" essentially a "probabilistic", "general purpose" classifier.