Learning How to Exert Self-Control
nytimes.com
nytimes.com
The secret of self-control, he says, is to train the prefrontal cortex to kick in first.
To do this, use specific if-then plans, like “If it’s before noon, I won’t check email” or “If I feel angry, I will count backward from 10.” Done repeatedly, this buys a few seconds to at least consider your options.
Self-control alone doesn’t guarantee success. People also need a “burning goal” that gives them a reason to activate these skills, he says.
Getting myself to start something difficult, form a habit, this kind of thing is hard.
It sounds a lot like something we often call "cognitive dissonance" in other contexts. It's easy to imagine that this sort of self-deception is an important foundational part of a lot of belief systems and zealotry of all stripes. The more you try to change a believer's mind with facts, the harder they concentrate on the imaginary cockroach that just crawled across the mousse. It could help explain why people who are very effective at changing the world around them are often also profoundly irrational believers in something, completely resistant to facts; the same basic disciplinary mechanism underlies both zeal and self-discipline.
Cognitive dissonance is very, very effective.
Another thing mentioned is stress. That is a big problem contributing to self-control.
Honestly during times when I am not being constructive it seems that my prefrontal cortex is not even really active.. The types of thinking that I do when I am working just aren't happening.
Actually it seems to me a bit like resting a muscle or letting a car cool down that is overheated. Sometimes I just need to actually start the engine of that part of my brain that handles goals and higher level thinking. Other aspects of health like general energy levels affect it.
But, you've missed the larger question, which was: how do you make triggers for acts similar to eating ice cream, which don't occur on screen or have any location based trigger?
If you want different things that's your choice but for most good things in life you need willpower. You can't do what the guy from "Into the wild" did without willpower.
A better way to demonstrate that would be to measure trust and see to what extent it explains delaying gratification.
http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/18114085-the-truth-about-...
Every time I think of her, picture her taking a crap on the toilet...yeah it worked and eventually I stopped thinking of her in a positive manner. I continue to pass on this advice!
I'm not familiar with Mischel's work, though he's admirably produced a lot of it, no doubt reading some of it would teach me things worth knowing. I'm not assuming the article is truly representative of the breadth of such a prolific mind. My ideas on the subject reflect what I've seen and learned so far.
To say we are driven by limbic system emotion in one way and goal-driven prefrontal cortex (PFC) opposing it would be minimizing the magnificent complexity of our construction. Thing is, control of our own behavior is limited and the nature of such control hardly understood by neuroscience, leaving us in no position to confidently prescribe methods of self-control in general.
It should not be surprising that kids performing better on a test that measures exactly what is successful in school and the corporate world will be more successful than kids scoring poorly. Academic achievement requires a talent for anti-hedonism, and those not as gifted in this trait will likely not do as well.
OTOH the persistent stubbornness ("grit") required for some kinds of success isn't synonymous with pleasure denial as seems to be implied. Determined persistence has a strong emotional component, individuals with such traits take pleasure in their accomplishments even if others don't understand it at all. They also react strongly to attempts to deflect them from their path.
Emotional salience is intrinsic to strongly bound goals, one must have the desire, the drive in order to sustain the effort to achieve. The emotion is not suppressed but harnessed in service of the mission. To the goal-seeker, foregoing other pleasures "normal" people covet is not a sacrifice, it is simply unimportant and not missed.
In this paradigm, imagine the kid who's more eager to finish building the tower of blocks than interested in the taste of candy.
History shows us many people built like that: Paul Erlich (chemotherapy), Thomas Edison, Harold Edgerton, among so many others.
The saying "knowledge is power" applies, fully knowing what we feel and having the "grit" to feel it, connected to logical problem-solving is a very potent tool.
Maybe that's what the article about Mr. Mischel was really trying to say.