NASA’s Mars Curiosity Rover Arrives at Martian Mountain
nasa.gov
nasa.gov
These update videos are a chance to also get technical, drill into details and explain the Curiosity mission piece by piece over a long period of time, perhaps in style of minutephysics. Seems to me as a bit of a missed opportunity.
But a science planning blog gets posted here: http://astrogeology.usgs.gov/
Also nytimes has a nice tracker. No science, but select raw images: http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/science/space/mars-curios...
I'm supposing that any sort of rubber or similar material would prove prohibitively expensive in terms of mass?
I was thinking something more like a silicone rubber solid tire rather than a pneumatic one. I do see mass mentioned as well.
The NASA article (referenced both in another comment here and in the SE post responses) cites landing shocks and wheel deployment specifically among mass constraints.
http://www.planetary.org/blogs/emily-lakdawalla/2014/0819063...
Surprised it lasted this long. I understand weight was a concern, but surely for $2B, there's some exotic, more resilient alloy that could've been used? Or maybe just make those middle wheels 1mm thicker and eat the extra 3 1/3Kg.
Most of the instruments and the power source are expected to last ten years. The deteriorating wheels are a concern.