Google’s Deal for Polar Shows It Has Not Given Up on Google+
blogs.wsj.com
blogs.wsj.com
Additionally Google tends to head-shot products that aren't working (Wave, etc) so I'm inclined to believe they have private metrics that are promising.
Where and why?
The last thing I knew is that the Facebok hatred came from Google supporters who hate Facebook because it is Google's nemesis.
There's not liking or not using a service, and then there's pathological hatred.
I have never read a single positive thought on Facebook on this entire site in my entire time here.
I know them, they all express hatred for Facebook, but curiously, they never explain why.
>> There's not liking or not using a service, and then there's pathological hatred.
There is, but the reason is unknow to me.
>> I have never read a single positive thought on Facebook on this entire site in my entire time here.
Neather I, but again, the reason of so much hatred remains a mistery.
My theory is that those people hate Facebook because it is something that Google can't be, no matter how hard it tries, and they think Google should have that spot.
But why?
Are they getting pay to do it, it is because they are die hard fan boys?, or maybe both.
There are many many posts on HN talking about why someone got rid of their facebook account, or begging for an alternative, or throwing them under the PRISM bus.
However, many of them give explicit reasoning (sometimes in great detail), so not part of some pro-google astroturfing campaign, and there are many posts extolling the virtues of facebook, if only for practical reasons, so if you've "never read a single positive thought", you're suffering from severe selection or confirmation bias.
I've never seen one.
The reasons I've read are mostly emotional, other reasons because of technical issues that can be mitigated just changing the configurations, other reasons because they don't like Mark Zuckerberg.
Other reasons of why they don't like it are applied to G+ also, yet they use G+ w/o complains.
Now, if you can provide examples of valid reasons, then I'm all ears.
As I said, off in the weeds.
In any case, here's lots of counter examples for you: https://hn.algolia.com/#!/comment/forever/0/deleted%20facebo... (sorry, lots of emotional reasons in there too...it's hard to filter out a completely valid reason for stopping the use of something)
In other words, those people hate Facebook and they don't even know why.
Second, only 5 of the first 25 posts there even mention Google and most of those are also objecting to the same practices fro Google that they're objecting to from Facebook, so, as I said, you may be suffering from more than a little confirmation bias here.
So, you can't show me an example, I assume you are bluffing and neather you or anyone here has a valid reason to hate Facebook, at least not a reazoned one, just emotional.
While true, G+ doesn't actually address any of those reasons.
The Google+ stream is basically more of a (much, much) better Twitter than a Facebook clone. I use it for public work related communication and specific topics via communities and hashtags.
Disclaimer: I'm a Googler
Would go a long way to make G+ compelling. There's still not a good tool for sharing pictures/video on mobile. MMS/SMS is too clunky when I want to share something with 2 or more nearby friends.
I wish I could take a picture, swipe up and to the left from the picture to initiate sharing, and click on the "nearby" or "frequent" chat-heads that I want to share the picture with.
Google+ should have been a seamless (and transparent!) way of sharing content from all Google services.
Instead it is a weird social network, seated between the seats of a twitter and a facebook clone. It's probably great for twitter style yelling in the wind, but it really looks like its a facebook style only-shared-with-mutual-friends kind of network.
And Google services are awkwardly connected through G+. Are my pictures on Picasa or G+? And when they are on G+ are they shared with people I've added to my circles or with people following me? Or are they backed up until I decide to share them? This can all be controlled for sure, but it is completely non-obvious.
It is the same with hangouts. If you go to google.com/hangouts (a google search for hangouts will take you there as well!) you get an ad for the hangout app for mobile devices. But if you want to access hangouts online you have to go to G+. And from G+ you can log out of hangouts (what?) so what is hangouts? Is it a seperate service or is it g+ chat? If it is G+ chat, then why do I get an email instead of a G+ notification when people write me on hangouts?
I have no intention of leaving LinkedIn, Hacker News, Reddit, CNN, Stack Overflow... They're different things, and I use them for different reasons.
...Which would make some kind of sense in the light of the wearable hype, but certainly wouldn't do anything for Google+.
Too many Polars out there right now.