Jetpack helps soldiers run faster [video]
researchmatters.asu.edu
researchmatters.asu.edu
My experience with personal fitness is this - there's never just "one thing" you can do to make yourself run faster. Your entire body needs to be trained to the level to maintain performance.
In the case of a jetpack - that means hips and legs have to be able to turn over rapidly, heart and lungs need to be match turnover rate, elasticity of tendons, adapt to impact forces on ankles/knees/feet, and muscles need to process energy efficiently. There's much more i'm sure.
Basically - the only way this would work is if it was paired with an exoskeleton that would mitigate these issues to a large extent - for example, almost no force required from legs, with minimal turnover - using a "leaping" motion from the suit. So any fatso can move at a 4 min/mile.
Otherwise, all I could see this doing is possibly making an already highly trained runner about 5-10% more efficient, but with zero military application as a standalone. Soldiers typically carry about 50-60lbs of gear already, so you'd be asking people to be highly trained runners with 50-60lbs of gear - plus a jetpack - sounds like a recipe for face-planting and injury. You would need an exoskeleton to manage the load. Then - this could get very interesting.
Lot more research required, and yes, they'll probably need additional hardware for feet/legs to prevent injuries.
[1] Blinding in this case it not easy, but they can use a JetPack that sounds like the real one, but does nothing.
Designers and inventors can learn from this. When we want to make a huge jump, like to a working jet pack for flying, it often helps to take small, evolutionary steps.
ps: For flat surfaces I hope they made a test using some kind of rollerskates / shoe hybrid.
That said, adding distance would require more batteries, and that would add weight, but I would bet that the batteries are 1/10 the total weight with all the metal-housing and motors involved
Liquid fuels (gas/alcohol) are very efficient. Metal-air batteries may beat liquid fuels for ergs/kilo?
I guess it would have to be almost silent and not have a huge profile in the infra-red in most use cases, though.