As good an idea, and decent an implementation. Can we please change the title from this very sexist and heteronormative language?
"How very dare you, Cuthbert. That is a decidedly sexist way to refer to your spouse."
"My spouse? I do not possess zir, Kate is an independent human being associated with me through our mutual engagement in the social contract of marriage."
"Oh, that is such a monogamist way to put it.."
Though it is worth noting that not many do get annoyed at that phrasing, and overgeneralizing to paint others with it and thinking that has any bearing on their concerns is poor reasoning.
I didn't mean to suggest that you did contest the "my" - I was just agreeing that I've seen that before and that it is obnoxious and reading more into language than is there at any level. My second part was intended to emphasize, however, that that objection only applies where it applies, which as you say is not your comment.
I still think the title is substantively different than your "bros" example; it is referring to one particular person, and I think that matters a lot. As I said elsewhere, "Hackers build things to scratch itches, and then they share them. The fact that it's a particular other person's itch that got the ball rolling is interesting and potentially inspirational."
He made it for his wife, not for housewives in general (in fact for me there's no implication that it's specifically for housewives or that he does no cooking himself)
This is yet another instance of PC gone mad