It's ridiculous, of course. I always felt he and his staff were extremely objective and by volume, the vast majority of AnandTech's coverage was non-Apple in nature.
The whole idea of "picking sides" is so silly anyway...
As the downvotes are starting, I feel like pointing out that I don't blame him for accepting the offer. My point is that it's a point that can legitimately be made, whereas claiming that he was in Apple's pocket all along seems to me baseless.
Why? To quote wikipeida, "selling out is the compromising of integrity, morality, authenticity or principles in exchange for personal gain, such as money." That seems like an awfully strong accusation considering how little information there is on what he will be doing and what he will be getting in return for it.
Now, I'd be a hypocrite if I tried to make that case myself, because I stopped reading Anandtech a couple years ago, and I couldn't with a straight face demand that Anand care more about it than I do. I stopped largely because the news got dull and repetitive once 1) Intel decisively won the CPU war, and 2) the GPU market became a permanent stalemate between AMD and nVidia (plus a little bit of Intel). If Anand basically retired because there was no longer an interesting story to tell, well, I can relate to that.
> I think it would be loss of authenticity
I don't think what he does in his work for Apple has anything to do with it. If he tried to go back to the Anandtech style of journalism, I think he would lack credibility now that he has accepted a job at Apple.
> The present career change does seem a bit like selling out.
So I can't see him making this move unless it's something he really wants to do, as opposed to being lured by the money.
Can you blame him? After writing about technology for so long, surely he's gotten the itch to play a more direct role in its creation.
Imagine if you were a fan of baseball your entire life, and had been covering it for years, and you had a chance to actually go and play for a major league team. It could be a dream come true.
Anand was a great hardware reviewer. The only other reviewer I think of that compares to him would be Lisa from mobiletechreview.com. Her reviews aren't as technical, but not everyone needs that. What's important is that she's got integrity.
Most site are either Pro Apple or Pro Droid. Bashing one of them is easier and attack on one side.
You can read the iPhone 5S article, on a Droid user switching to iPhone for weeks experience.
It perfectly capture the essence and explain the "reason" behind certain design decisions from Apple. You may not agree with it, hence you can choose a different platform. But there is certainly nothing wrong with the "decision" in itself. And people are just keep bashing Apple and bashing sake.
Being Apple, there must be a reason they do things in certain way. Be it cost? Performance? Battery Life etc? All these technical details Apple just wouldn't explain to you because Apple think you shouldn't care about the technical side of things and you should concentrate on the experience. But being geek as we are, Anandtech will go deep and dig out all the information they can, then try to explain it, explaining the "reason" behind all these decisions.
I mean the rivalry, especially the hate from FansDriod these days are getting insane. I dont see this with AMD and Intel. Heck even AMD fans would admit Intel have better products.
And in my view Anandtech reviews lots of Android phone as well. So i dont understand why people would label him as an Apple servant.
> Is that because America's culture just like doing it this way?
I see two reasons for everybody "picking sides" in America. The second one might be somewhat unique to America.
1. We have lots of advertising where one brand talks negatively about the other brand. People see these ads and think they have to "pick a side." But I think this is true everywhere in the world, right?
2. In America most people are stuck with their mobile phones for 2 years. The mobile phone providers mostly want to sign you up to 2-year contracts and pay for your phone slowly over those 2 years. There are ways around this but most people wind up stuck with their phones for 2 years and so sometimes they feel like they have to "defend" the phone they picked.
I think "picking sides" is dumb. I use Linux, OSX, and Windows pretty equally. I like my Android tablet and my iOS phone.
I also had Sega Genesis AND Super Nintendo as soon as I could afford both. I believe that if you are truly a fan of technology... why wouldn't you want to try/use them all? :)