After seeing Europe's transit system first-hand all summer, it makes little sense to me why the investment has not been made in the USA—especially in larger metropolitan areas like SF.
After seeing Europe's transit system first-hand all summer, it makes little sense to me why the investment has not been made in the USA—especially in larger metropolitan areas like SF.
The investments were made, and then the fruits of those investments were systematically destroyed over about a decade, sixty years ago.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Motors_streetcar_conspi...
As for why nothing is happening now: the only thing the public can seem to agree on is putting people in prison and defense spending. So that's why.
A friend shared that article with me after seeing my comment—purely capitalistic entities operate both idiotically (in terms of good for the whole) and predictably.
"All for ourselves, and nothing for other people, seems, in every age of the world, to have been the vile maxim of the masters of mankind." — Adam Smith, The Wealth of Nations, Book III, Chapter IV, p. 448
Of course, but most work for the poor (to put it bluntly), does not include carrying things through the subway. It includes showing up on work on-time and working hard—whether that's laying bricks or washing dishes. If your car breaks down, you're out a job. If the subway breaks down (much less likely), your employer or four other employees just might have been on that subway, too.
> And SF has BART, caltrain, and MUNI, and while they all smell like urine, they do pretty much get you exactly where you want to go.
If usage increased, I dare say they would get cleaned up (public trains in former Eastern European countries are even non-smelly). I don't live in SF, though, so I have no experience to back up my hunch.