Unemployment is not a disease
deepleafproductions.com
deepleafproductions.com
We still have more problems to resolve (such as the finite nature of terrestrial resources) before all undesirable but necessary tasks are automated, and we can spend our lives entirely on art/science.
With the infrastructure that's been built, we have wonderful tools that we can use to learn how to extend human life. Just as we once moved from agriculture to manufacturing we should move again now to massive efforts to advance and practice medicine. In addition to being immoral, socialism (the article proposes several guaranteed-income programs) is not a practical system for getting the results needed to meet the challenges we face.
As I learn about cancer biology, I often wish that even more people would jump in and try to figure things out. The field is full of incredibly tough problems, and they are of paramount importance to virtually everyone: you're going to get cancer if you live long enough.
You might think it's fantastic that millions of average folks should go and get educations in the sciences, and perhaps it is. But socialism simply would pull people in the exact opposite direction. (See some statistics on Saudi Arabia if you want to see what free money does to a people.)
This is almost true. Everybody who wants to work should be able to do so, have the right to do so. It's not needed for society as a whole that everybody has to work (to survive) like today.