http://ycombinator.com/arc/arc3.tar
Personally I think releasing that data is a bad idea. It might help people to game the system and it might inadvertently release more than intended, see:
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2009/09/your-secrets...
Datamining a body of data like that is likely to turn up all kinds of interesting tidbits, amongst others you could use it to identify the 30 or so 'secret' power users on HN, figure out when they're sleeping and so maximize your take on spammed links.
Even now it can take more than 2 hours before a spam link gets deleted, no need to make it worse.
Not everybody uses HN with good intentions, there are plenty of people that see this as just another place to dump their links.
Leaderspage is just below: line 2262. The line we're interested in is line 2266: (each u (firstn nleaders* (leading-users)) This line says "for each of the first nleaders* in the list returned by (leading-users), do the following:".
Leading-users is line 2276. It returns a sorted list of users by karma. When looking at a user and deciding whether to sort em, it asks two questions: "does this user have more karma than the constant leader-threshold*?" and "is this user not an admin?"
So if you ever find a user who has more karma than whoever is the last user on the leaders page, but isn't on it, either you've found an admin, or the code running this site has been changed from the 3.1 release.
In the US, old people are a powerful voting block because they vote a lot. Do a small fraction of HN readers have a highly disproportionate effect on karma?
(def save-votes (u) (save-table (votes* u) (+ votedir* u)))
So the data could be gotten as a zip, but not a SQL dump.
(Note: I am completely ignorant about HN's code -- I don't know how they cache or calculate anything).
Comments would be ranked purely reverse-chronological until people started voting.
It'd be less disruptive to the front of the site than another revisiting of 'Erlang sure is interesting'. Past threads would slowly be mined for re-karma as they were re-submitted and found in google searches.
I think there are many people who might be curious about the statistical properties
I am also :)