A Mother’s Journey Through the Unnerving Universe of ‘Unboxing’ Videos
nytimes.com
nytimes.com
My daughter is about to enter Montessori, and one of the techniques they like is to simply demonstrate to a child - not much narration, no shortcuts or summarizing, just demonstration. And I realized how little I do this, even though I describe things to my daughter constantly.
So maybe these videos are filling that gap. The commercialism might be a supply-side phenomena, since that's where the ad dollars are.
I would think he means mason, not a carpenter. Though I didn't watch the video (no Flash).
But that's not what unboxing videos are. I've never found one to be enjoyable. I just stumbled across some when trying to search for reviews of products and they can't hold my attention.
1. You'll never look at normal schooling the same way again. You'll find the thought of sending your kinds to a traditional school depressing and wonder how anyone can think it's a good idea
2. Every parent/teacher you who finds out you send your kids to a non-traditional school, and who hasn't experience of them, will find the need to defend traditional schooling
3. Unless you're lucky enough to have access to a Montessori high school, or you're able to homeschool, you'll have to face the day when you send your kids back into a normal school.
I had to learn these the hard way, my and cannot recommended the system. Interestingly in practice Montessori education is not a chouce between traditional and experimental education, but rather a choice between dysfunctional public schools or experimental education.
What do you mean by "paying attention"? One of the thinks I really like about Montessori, and I'm guessing each school is different, is that the children are able to develop long attention spans and learn to stay focused on something for as long as they like; half a day is not uncommon, and an entire day is possible. Normal school allows children just long enough to become absorbed in something, then interrupts them with "change class!". Montessori allows that child so keep focused on their activity (drawing a map, writing a story, maths, etc) for as long as they want.
The up-side is that I've found Montessori to be a very efficient means of learning. My kids have no homework and an enjoyable relaxing day, but they're far ahead of their friends in normal schools.
Down-side is, like you say, low tollerence for droning teachers and being bored
Kids can play a video-game for 8 hours straight. Focusing on something you don't want to do, or is hard to do, is a better indicator of discipline.
>>but they're far ahead of their friends in normal schools.
The real problem isn't the failure of an educational style but rather particular institutions. Where I grew up the kids who went to good private schools were at the same level as us. As I wrote earlier we often compare apples to oranges when we compare against Montessori schools, comparing bad (public) to Montessori(more expensive, private). If we can't find a familiarly priced or ranked school, with a similar level of parent involvement, we should avoid making a judgement about the method.
Maybe this type of video is something every tradie [1] should have on their website? Watching this video makes me realise that this guy can do a fast job to a high standard, and that I'd have no hesitation in hiring him if I needed bricks laid, despite my general preference for doing jobs around the house myself.
One, great video, it had a very Zen like quality. However, I fully acknowledge my ignorance in understanding of "Zen" or Eastern philosophies in anything but the most superficial of ways (so it might not be that Zen after all).
Two, did you see that mortar work?! (Full on 1st world problem self entitled asshole rant incoming...) I was told by my house builder that the brickwork of my home, which has a very baby diarrhea-esque mortar application vibe to it, is the current "style". I think it's more likely they didn't want to pay craftsmen like the guys in the video that do good clean mortar work.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One_Day_in_the_Life_of_Ivan_Den...
[0]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autonomous_sensory_meridian_res...
Edit: I love how this article just tapers off into nothingness.
Some people record videos of those special sounds and share them. Some of the people who listen to them are the people who feel nice.
A group of people with a shared interest is a community. There is a community for people who like listening to the sounds or who like making the videos.
Some of the sounds that give people joy are: whispering or quiet talking women; quiet ticks and tacks of fingernails on wood; rustling paper; fingers stroking card; and so on.
Cold chills (often called "goose bumps" "goose pimples" "goose skin" "chicken skin") is the most common. Most people experience it from time to time. Like during a scary movie. It feels vaguely pleasant but unusual and is triggered by an emotional perception - like the anticipation of something scary. It's rarely accompanied by a strong emotional reflex in response.
The other two, ASMR and Frisson, are more rare. Most people don't experience these and even fewer experience both. For example, I can Frisson, but I can't ASMR. The numbers for each are something like 3-10% of the population. But it's only recently started to get attention and research.
ASMR is a pleasurable feeling due to a person specific stimulus. It can the sound of whispering, or box flaps rubbing on each other. Usually gentle sounds in certain categories. There are non-audio versions of it as well. something about the stimulus triggers an deep pleasurable feeling in most people who can ASMR. It's probably a little like getting a little endorphine boost or taking a little pleasure drug. It's usually accompanied by "cold chill" like physical reactions but also an internal mental/emotional reaction as well (typically pleasant). People who can ASMR describe an ASMR reaction as being distinct from a cold chill.
Recently the internet has allowed people who can ASMR to share triggers and discuss the phenomenon. I don't know much more about it than any other non-ASMR but I come across it every once in a while while investigating Frisson as the two phenomenon are often confused.
Here's an entire reddit dedicated capturing and sharing ASMR triggers.
Note that this doesn't mean any person who can ASMR can come here and use any trigger. The triggers are highly specific to the individual.
Frisson is a similar phenomenon and a bit better studied. I can talk more about this one since I can Frisson. Frisson is tied very specifically to musical perception, but can occur outside of music as well.
While the general population might be 3-10% Frisson-able, musicians tend to be much higher. It's similar to ASMR in the sense that a "trigger" kicks off an extremely pleasurable emotional and physical response. For different people who can Frisson, it's usually extremely specific passages in certain songs (or even certain performances of a song).
And yes, there are communities who share their frisson triggers You'll often see a link to a song and a description of the specific passage or time index when the sharer typically frissons. http://www.reddit.com/r/frisson
A frisson is like a very intense cold-chill, usually in the upper body. I get it very strongly along the sides of my upper spine between my shoulder blades. If cold chills can be ranked from 1-10 on an intensity scale, the typical frisson would be like a 20 to a 50.
But there's a deep emotional reaction too. I can't speak for all frissoners, but for me it's a transcendent all consuming emotion, like all of my emotions are triggered at once and amplified out of my own control. It feels like you are right in the middle of the most terrible, most beautiful experience a human can have. Like all of your closest loved ones died and were suddenly found alive at the same time.
The same passage can induce a frisson over and over again for a while. But a bit like a drug, you can "get used to" a passage till you've lost the ability to frisson to it. So frissoners are often on the lookout for new triggers.
Not suprisingly, it's linked to rises in dopamine levels and can be addictive in all the ways dopamine addiction works -- including the withdrawal crankiness. It's rare enough that I've never met another person face-to-face who I was aware was a fellow frissoner. Most non-frissoners just think it's "extreme enjoyment of music" but it's quite distinct and different. I never even knew what it was called until I was almost 30 and decided to investigate it a bit.
I discovered it when I was maybe 4 or 5, I found a passage on a tape and my mother found me playing that passage over and over again on the home stereo while hysterically laughing and crying my eyes out. For a long time my mother thought something was wrong with me or that I was unusually sensitive to music. I was actually so embarrassed by it that I hid it from everybody for a very long time.
But growing up I played some tapes to absolute death trying to get my "fix". Later I started to learn that if I over frissoned to the same musical passage it would eventually lose the effect. So I learned to ration it out and collected a sizable library of tapes I could cycle through. I started to mentally categorize music by how much of a frisson it could create. I started to use frisson to deal with stress and anxiety. It had all the hallmarks of a drug addiction I guess except I only had to find a supply of music and not street drugs.
Happy to answer any questions anybody might have.
What really interests me is that there are probably other sensory phenomenon that are equally fascinating that very few people experience that aren't generally known (like synesthesia).
Glad to hear I'm not alone. My wife and I listened to the This American Life program on ASMR and I couldn't even stand the few short snippets in the program. The whispery sound of quiet talking where you can hear the speaker's tongue flapping around in their mouth makes me want to pull my teeth out with pliers.
I'll read more about it, but thanks for getting me introduced!
I wonder if any of these conditions are related somehow.
When he was younger he had some low grade Tourette's-like symptoms and various other neurological issues. Misophonia is supposed to have some kind of possible connection to Tourette's.
However, he may also frisson or ASMR (or something in the category) and has an intense interest in certain kinds of music and has built quite a few home-made ultra high end home stereos out of car audio components.
Amazingly, almost none of the things we're talking about here are well recognized by the psychiatric or neuroscience communities.
There are also visual triggers, to make matters worse. For some reason beyond my understanding, I hate when people bounce their legs around in their seats, or tap their feet repeatedly on the floor. Drives me insane.
I've never had Tourette's, or any Tourette's-like symptoms, but I completely sympathize with those who do. My symptoms are similarly uncontrollable. I know they're weird, and I know that telling people about them generally pisses people off. So I am consigned to my own special hell, quietly mustering the mental energy to block these stimuli out in everyday life, knowing that nobody understands the problem nor has the slightest sympathy. Medical research barely takes the condition seriously, and a lot of doctors still refuse to acknowledge that it's real, and not some Freudian, neurotic symptom.
In a way, I feel like what someone with Tourette's must have felt like, back before Tourette's was medically or societally acknowledged. Every now and then, misophonia gets a cursory writeup in a major newspaper or magazine -- but even that coverage typically ends with some dismissive caveat, such as "Medical science doesn't currently acknowledge this as a legitimate condition." Well, I'm certainly not doing this for the fun of it. :)
As for the neurological explanations: as the previous poster mentioned, recent studies have implicated a lot of the same brain and nervous system structures in misophonia that are believed to be responsible for Tourette's. There is a high degree of comorbidity. While the two aren't causally related, there appears to be a physical/structural cause that results in either or both conditions with a fair amount of frequency.
Again, I have no definitive way of ruling out some blanket neurosis as the underlying cause. But it seems scientifically dubious, and more important, it's often unproductive as a line of inquiry.
I suppose I have a name for this now...
Hell yeah, my experience exactly. When I'm eating meals with family, I need there to be a conversation going, or at least a TV or radio running in a background - if there's only silence and sounds of eating, I'm starting to go crazy.
There used to be a very good page on the phenomenon, but it's long gone and there's not even any history of it existing that I'm aware of. Now, because it's gone, most pages that document frisson are now calling it "cold chills" and referring back to WP.
Edits appreciated.
https://web.archive.org/web/20060515000000*/https://en.wikip...
20060913 includes this content:
An experience, commonly associated with especially moving or Ecstatic_listening moments, where a sensation of "shivers" occurs. The frisson experience begins as a flexing of the skin in the lower back, rising upward, inward from the shoulders, up the neck, and sometimes across to the cheeks and onto the scalp. The face may become flush, hair follicles flex the hairs into standing position, and goose bumps may appear (Piloerection). Frequently, a series of `waves' will rise up the back in rapid succession. The experience lasts no more than four or five seconds. The listener feels the music to have elicited an ecstatic moment and tends to regard the experience as involuntary. Http://www.music-cog.ohio-state.edu/Music838/glossary.html
[1] some of the rest can be attributed to how views are counted.
There's a bunch of stuff that I haven't bought because I saw it in use on YouTube.
Maybe I'm totally misjudging and the primary attraction that they instill the same reaction as getting a shiny new gadget does.
1) the "first impressions review". Descriptions of how sturdy or flimsy or smooth something feels, how it disappoints or delights compared to the picture on the box, whether it works as expected immediately. This actually seems really useful to me as a supplement to written reviews.
2) the "revel in the thing itself" unboxing. My preschool-aged nephew loves these videos. He seems to have as much fun watching people play with new toys as he does actually playing with new toys, or more. In a sense, this sort of video actually shields him from disappointment -- if the toy sucks, he can just move on to the next video, or he might not even notice since the person on screen is probably having fun anyway.
Sometimes unboxing can give you valuable and otherwise hard to find information, e.g. how big the transformer is and how it looks. That stuff is typically nowhere to be found, not on the website of whoever made the thing (even if you search for the manual) and often not in reviews (at least if the transformer isn’t extremely enormous or extremely ugly or otherwise noteworthy).
First impressions tend to be pretty useless in my opinion since it’s not very thought out and all very subjective. Maybe sometimes something useful is said, but it’s mostly useless.
It’s also good for getting a non-product-photo look at the product. For some things there just aren’t any video reviews and photos often just don’t cut it. It’s always good to get more than one look at a product.
Not the Bitbox's packaging, but the postal wrapper which came from France. As an American, I've felt a small bit of fear as I've watched our financial resources diminish. When I saw the multi-colored postal package, with its delicate rose-colored gradient, I had the distinct cognition "Hey, there's a country and a people unafraid to spend some resources on making their postal packages look good."
We should get our national shit together.
http://grand-army.com/work/projects/project.php?project=usps...
of the average Toddler.
I'm sure some adults watch it to, but it's aimed at very young kids.
This specific video might be aimed at toddlers, but the article notes that there are unboxing videos for all sorts of products with hundreds of millions of views in aggregate. Hundreds of millions of views represents a significant portion of Americans.
I bought a camping tent after watching about 10 unboxing videos. I got a table saw about a year ago the same way, watch a couple videos first.
I am well aware probably 1/2 the video are astroturf. If I tune out the speech the video speaks for itself. Oh, OK, with my own eyes I see thats how you adjust the height of the blade. I like/dislike that particular saw's blade lifting design.
The problem is narrow focus by marketing making at least some purchasers prefer homemade commercials over their hyper focused "professional" commercials which unfortunately suck. Lets say someone is trying to sell a "pro-grade" digital multimeter and I'm trying to buy one. Unfortunately the market "user interface" will be a little too "stylized" and probably rely on sexual objectification of women and business cliche speak.
Some beautiful very young woman who has no idea what the product does reads a script explaining "Our ISO9000 manufactured meter will synergistically energize your resources to proactively meet their key performance indicators". Unfortunately as a mere user of the device instead of being a CEO, that kind of marketing is useless to me as a purchaser, I have no idea how painful the device makes it to switch between ammeter and voltmeter probe wiring topology and how useful is the continuity feature anyway? The official PR materials suck so much I'll just watch an unboxing video. That may be the only way I'll be permitted to get a straight answer WRT the connectors being too tight to easily swap.
I have plenty of experience where the quality of PR has little correlation with the quality of the product, so I'm not overly concerned. I can see why pro content creators are terrified. This is equivalent to when print journalists first noticed some people prefer bloggers to their "professional" productions, following which about 50% of them lost their professional jobs.
From my kids, they like to study stuff they like. In the unlikely event we ever get a Wii-U my son is already an expert on how to connect it to the TV and configure it. I admit I've been window shopping new oscilloscopes, including ones I'll never be able to afford... The article makes fun of a $2 plastic egg, but I don't waste money on that for my kids on a regular basis, so I can see the kid appeal.
It's like the unboxing video in the original article, except given an additional play-cooking element and taken to an extreme of meticulousness.
See all the videos here (the Mentos + Cola one is quite unexpected):
https://www.youtube.com/user/RRcherrypie/videos?flow=grid&vi...
Our son always seems to end up on such videos and can watch them for as long as possible. Really freaky.
Seems the people behind it are taking a nice cheque home each month.
The super-engaged toddlers are remniscent of those in the "Smile Time" episode of Whedon's Angel.
My guess would be it is just a very easy, non-thinking way of creating content and gaining attention.
Your brain can't entirely distinguish between watching a video game on a screen and actually controlling the action.
I'm not sure I agree with that. I'm an avid gamer but find long gameplay-only vids to be pretty boring. The really successful lets-plays are good because there are one or more people talking over them.
Or, to put that more incendiarily: the degree to which a non-voiceover, 100% completion, edited-for-repetition LP (these are usually called "longplays") of a game serves as a good replacement for playing the game, is inversely proportional to the degree to which the game is actually a game, rather than interactive fiction.
The least interesting longplays are made from games that are games in an essential sense: games that are about the aesthetic of exploring and mastering the mechanics of an environment. Simulation games, procedurally-generated adventure games, etc. If you don't wrap a narrative around these, there's nothing compelling there to watch. It's only compelling to play.
I'm wondering whether the proliferation of LPs will actually kill the market for genres like the JRPG, the visual novel/dating sim, etc. as people feel satisfied with just having watched the-movie-of-the-game and are left with no urge to play.
---
Three examples:
1. I recently tried to watch a Kirby: Epic Yarn LP and fell asleep after five minutes. Yet I'd gladly play it as a game. The same applies to, say, Tetris.
2. Final Fantasy makes for excellent long plays. I played FFVII once and have no urge to do so again, but I'm still waiting for the FFVII-HD longplay well-cut enough that some friends and I can just watch it and Advent Children in sequence as if it were any other movie series.
3. I still do pull out games like FFV every once in a while, just to faff about with the combinatoric possibilities of the battle system and to replay some of the boss battles--but I have no urge to undergo the grindy bits. What I really want from these sorts of hybrids is a CG movie that comes with a "bonus disc" that lets you jump right into the various preset sandbox fights, plot battles, and minigames. As it is, I frequently keep emulator save states to do exactly this.
Here's Avder wrecking D1 level 6: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kCLhArmirhw
Agreed, in that I can't understand why somebody would be interested in either.
I sometimes watch people play video games. Some of my reasons are:
1. I'm bad at video games, but like seeing the story unfold.
2. I'm not sure if I want to buy the game or not, so I watch someone play it to decide.
Some other people also watch others play games to learn, to increase their skill, because they find the player/presenter amusing, etc.
Nope.
I've noticed that I enjoy watching youtube videos of other people coding, and I like where you're going by tying watching sports with watching unboxing videos.
I've always thought I liked watching coding videos because I secretly wish I could just think about programs and make them happen, instead of having to sit up, type, switch between contexts, etc. Coding videos go straight to the point and quench a specific thirst I have when I don't feel like coding anymore but would still like the high I get from seeing the coding process unfold.
Not well, because I don't watch sports. I also don't watch unboxing videos - I just watch videogames, for the reasons I explained above.
I'm just sort of assuming that sports are fun, and they're also fun to watch, and a lot easier than spending thousands of dollars and hours of time on equipment.
(I also hate watching coding videos - they never go at the pace I prefer. I'd much rather read a blog entry with code inlined that I could copy, paste, play around with, etc.)
Nope. Generally speaking, I don't understand second-degree entertainment (ie. watching other people have fun & do things: sports, video games, unboxing videos, reality TV).
I guess you have a lot to learn about humans. (Not saying, you have to enjoy it.)
By the way, do you like stories?
I even had the emotional connection and cried a little tear when one of the main protagonists is murdered as part of the story arc, I have posted it as "most emotional response to a video game" type threads on Reddit.
I learned how to make an automatic egg/chicken factory in minecraft from watching a video. I'd never have imagined something so crazy without seeing it live in 3-D first. You do what with wooden signs, and then pour flowing water on them, and then throw chickens on it? Madness! Yet it works!
I imagine this has a lot to do with 3-d and open world type games where having an experienced field guide walk you thru a real world-ish experience helps.
(edited to add, I live in a geographic area where many people make a living as hunting and fishing guides; the "experienced field guide" phrase for video games is very intentional, I suspect in the next decade or so of video gaming, there will be people making a modest living off literally being field guides for video gamers... just kinda escorting noobs and showing them the ropes, maybe not a lot of money but more than they'd get off the mechanical turk)
XisumaVoid [1] does nice, clear, tutorials of a bunch of different stuff.
Etho [2] also does some tutorials, but he embeds them into his "Let's Play" series. He's also part of a server and I enjoyed the derping around they did.
BDoubleO and GuudeBoulderFist (as OOG [3]) had some funny videos of them playing a challenge map while drunk.
Yogscast [4] had one series that appealed to me at a particular time of my life when I just needed disposable nonsense.
[1] https://www.youtube.com/user/xisumavoid
[2] http://www.youtube.com/user/EthosLab
[3] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wXpOn5V_NWw&list=PL57E50DFE2... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YOKorN4Dg64&list=PL535DD4748...
[4] https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLF60520313D07F366
It's just another trigger the modern world has uncovered in our ape brains. The thrill of unwrapping a banana or mango writ large. It probably won't hurt your kids but if they are watching videos unsupervised and you "come across" them watching that's probably a bigger flag to you.