Yubari, Japan: a city learns how to die
theguardian.com
theguardian.com
http://spikejapan.wordpress.com/2014/08/16/yubari-withering-...
(…darn, I just noticed the comment by taoquay).
This is nothing specific to Yubari. The same can be said about most small cities in Japan.
It's not implying that it's specific to Yubari.
It's implying that it doesn't have the crime stats that are usual in decaying cities of the rust-belt.
Comparing decaying cities of the rust-belt with an average small city in Japan wouldn't be fair. Comparing them with a decaying city on the other hand makes sense.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Japan_earthquake_store_she...
http://www.theatlantic.com/daily-dish/archive/2011/03/why-no...
FWIW the main reason there is less looting in Japan is because they have done a better job at eliminating poverty. Here's what happened before they had done so:
Obviously, there is going to be some looting. But, consider a previous natural disaster of approximate magnitude* which took place a few years previously on a coastal city in the US. Compare the response by the US government, the Americans there, and more broadly American society. The Japanese have something figured out that Americans have forgotten, or more probably never had.
(*Not really, Tohoku was considerably worse than Katrina in magnitude and scope.)
Oh, come on. In the countryside farmers put vegetables in unattended booths for people to grab and put a coin in a hole for payment. Nobody's stealing. Where else in the world do you see that ?
But hey, weighing your produce yourself at the supermarket is also a thing here, and it works fine as well. Sometimes I think it's just a part of society, no matter the cultural, ethnical or economical background people have - if you trust them to "do the right thing", most suddenly feel sort of honoured and obligated to behave the right way. If you put police everywhere and assume people to be criminal first, they will act accordingly (test their 'freedom' as soon as noone is looking). It probably doesn't work if it's just one farmer / supermarket doing it, but I think when it's a common part of society, it suddenly works.
Immediately following the earthquake, transportation problems stranded many workers in Tokyo and cut off supply lines for stores. Those two issues combined with panic buying to result in the scene above shortly after the earthquake.
Also, it's weird, but I love the Japanese melons even though I do not like cantaloupe--they always taste rotten to me.
For anyone unaware the most helpful signal for picking properly ripe melons is smell. Unripe melons will usually have no smell at all, while overly ripe ones will have hints of a rotten fruit odor mixed in, even while still being completely firm in feel. The outside of an uncut melon should smell sweet and fragrant through and through, and just one sniff should be enough to tell which fruits should be passed over without a second thought.
For already chopped melon a lot of times it's a gamble, and odds are bad. In the US at least most fruit salad preparers are barely payed, and likely not even given the basic authority to be selective about what fruit they chop up in the first place. Basically no one cares how properly ripe or palatable the fruit is, and so sadly-often it simply tastes like oh so much disgusting garbage.
Unfortunately melons are some of the worst-affected victims in the race-to-the-bottom world of modern mass-production fruit, along with apples, pears, tomatoes and olives. Like with humans when no one cares to begin with crime is much much more common.
I know that the Japanese put considerably more effort into quality than what I've seen from other markets. I haven't completely ruled out the idea that there's something unique to the Japanese cultivar, though. But every cantaloupe I've ever tasted had a rotten flavor that prevented me from enjoying it. I don't know if others don't mind that flavor or what, but it has prevented me from enjoying any melons available from US markets.
I keep hearing that good ones exist, but I have yet to actually eat one.
If a dying city invested in great internet connectivity in one neighbourhood, offered extremely reasonable cost of living expenses (mostly cheap rent), maybe even a tax break in the first 2-3 years of your business, would you consider relocating to help keep your startup expenses down?
This is not a village, it's a city with a population of 120k falling down to 10k.
A population of 120k would put it as a top-5 city in any medium-sized European country. And it is completely unimaginable that such a city would die this way (unless it were destroyed in a war).
So no, it's actually very similar to cities in northen France, West Germany and South Belgium which lived from coal as well and quickly dropped in population as well. And the same thing is happening in Detroit as the auto industry dissappeared as well. It's all the same thing at work.
Heiko Voigt, the deputy mayor here, can point out dozens of vacant homes that he doubts will ever be sold. The reality is that the German population is shrinking and towns like this one are working hard to hide the emptiness. Mr. Voigt has already supervised the demolition of 60 houses and 12 apartment blocs, strategically injecting grassy patches into once-dense complexes.
[1] http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/14/world/europe/germany-fight...
[1] https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sonneberg#mediaviewer/Datei:Po...
Europe only has a couple of medium-sized countries—Germany and France. 150k people wouldn't make for a top 5 city in either. 120k people is a town, not a city.
Clarification: Examples of large countries (both in terms of land mass and influence) would be Russia, China, Japan, Australia, the US, Brazil, etc
Not sure what you are using as a definition of "medium sized", but if France and Germany are included you may want to consider the following (with roughly the same size): Spain, Italy, Poland, Ukraine, Russia, United Kingdom, Sweden, Norway, Finland (Turkey of course is large too, but the European part is quite small - unlike Russia, where European part is large)
Incidentally the population of the Tokyo agglomeration (39 million) isn't far off Spain (46 million) or Ukraine (45 million) and is greater than Poland (38 million) as well as much greater than Australia (22 million). All that proves is that there are some cities with very large populations.
That simply isn't true. There are a number of similar sized European cities shrinking - although not quite at the same dramatic rate. For example, Miskolc (in Hungary) has shrunk from 186K to 168K since 2000, and there are a number of other cities with similar problems[1].
Another example which is more directly comparable is the former oil shale mining town of Kohtla-Järve in Estonia. In 1980 it had a population of 90,000 while today it is 37,000[2].
[1] http://www.citymetric.com/chart-eastern-europes-incredible-s...
Japan would rather have robots than immigrants but ultimately, like immigration boom that happened in the west due to lack of indigenous population supply, foreign workers has to come.
>>barely one in 20 of the population under the age of 15
>>[the population] more than halved again, to below 10,000
So 10K/20 == 500.