What is their real motive?
Let's say when reaching out to deliver your incubators' stock certificates they declined to accept them and preferred to offer you a promissory note on really generous terms...
Would you smell a rat? Why would they not want the stock certificates?
One may say; "they don't want them because they will be worthless as you're likely to fail - especially without their support."
Ok, but if the stock certs are worthless, why invest in high power lawyers to draw up a promissory note where the "startup doomed for failure" will have no chance of paying the money back anyway?
All I can come up with is this; a) bound by the terms of the initial offer letter, their providing you with the outstanding balance of services they failed to deliver is more expensive than just drawing a note b) maintaining oversight of their investment in a startup doomed for failure is more expensive than issuing a note...
Really want to make sure I'm thinking about this from all angles.
Please - I welcome you guys' thoughts.