So, three countries are going to claim the North Pole, all backed by scientific analysis. By irony the hydrocarbon resources below the sea ice becomes accessible because of excessive use of hydrocarbon. Summer sea ice volume atrophied to a fourth in last 30 years. On the Siberian side of the Arctic hydrocarbon bubbles already up from the sea bed probably because of Arctic amplification and recently we learned warming permafrost tends to explode and build craters. According to the USGS oil resources assumed in the Arctic satisfy global consumption for 3 years, gas a bit longer. If Arctic sea ice finally disappears you'll see the environmental damage from the moon with an unarmed eye. From the other pole we hear the western land based ice sheet is unstoppable collapsing adding a few meters to sea level on the long run. Actually the Arctic is still quite beautiful, that's why soon you can book month long passages from Anchorage to New York worth $20,000.
Now please tell me that all makes perfectly sense and is not based on kids having sandbox adventures.