I inadvertently started a second debate by posting the content of the article here. I felt I had little choice. I'd rather skip the whole thing than send someone to that site. But I wanted to discuss the content, which was excellent.
If it wasn't for that excellent content, I would have never struggled with this horrendous site. It was as if they are daring you to finish the article. Some of the other horrors:
- embedded video ads (incredibly distracting)
- way too many words of the article were underlined links
- many other underlined links that were *not* content and hard to differentiate
- tool tips everywhere, that were a huge problem because
- you need to mouse so much just to scroll the content
- less than 10% of screen real estate used for content, which
- brings up a new acronym, WTFA *Where's* the fucking article?