Even if we forget about the US/Europe thing, remember that Yanukovych was previously ousted from power in another revolution 10 years before: the Orange Revolution.
Even if we forget about the US/Europe thing, remember that Yanukovych was previously ousted from power in another revolution 10 years before: the Orange Revolution.
Next, there is a speech where Nuland brags about "investing" $5 billion dollars in Ukraine to help it "achieve its European aspirations" [3]. And here is an article [4] about part of the money going to unknown recipients or political parties and NGOs.
[1] http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-26079957
[2] http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-25896786
[3] http://www.state.gov/p/eur/rls/rm/2013/dec/218804.htm
[4] http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/03/07/us-foreign-aid-ukra...
I don't think it's a conspiracy that US successfully managed to get Ukraine out of Russia's hands. A good thing, some might say.
However, I think it's nonsense to suggest it's some massive US/EU plot to get revenge on Russia. It was spontaneous and reacting to something completely unrelated to Snowden or Syria.
Given the scale and duration of Euromaidan the chances of it being a spontaneous phenomenon are zero. It had to be centrally coordinated and directed to last this long. It could've been coordinated by activists, but then somehow all their organizational skills disappeared right after Yanukovich was gone. Just look at the mess that followed. Someone else was directing.
The US was unquestionably involved in both, not sure why you think otherwise...
Are you joking? http://www.theguardian.com/world/2004/nov/26/ukraine.usa
This is how virtually every revolution goes.