Bizarro World: World Record Tetris (2007)
boston.com
boston.com
I considered myself the fastest mouse mover of all universe.
http://mrdoob.com/lab/javascript/effects/solitaire/
Drag the mouse for great victory.
You, sir, have made my day.
Was that with three-card flip or one-card?
We finished the game pretty quickly and then became hopelessly obsessed with shaving fractions of seconds off our best times on the easier levels; we were both supremely competitive people (and averagely well coordinated, I guess) and this went on for two or maybe three weeks until we found somewhere to live, got Internet access, and had some meaningful form of employment. We hardly played it after that.
A few years later, I looked online and found some sites with high-scores; ours were, on certain levels (the ones we'd really cared about), by so far the best in the world it was pretty funny.
We played that one hundreds of times, experimenting with the straight roll off the edge, roll-jumping, a quick brake before slipping over the edge, everything we could think of to shave off that last little bit.
Thanks for reminding me. :)
If you had a video of your attempt, or at least a screenshot of the ending screen, you would be either the #3 (if it was 3-draw) or the #7 (1-draw) Windows 95 Solitaire player in the world.
Thanks for the link. Good to know I was really good at that.
I was champion briefly when I had around 40 games in a row. Then my co-worker blew me away at 64 for about a week. Nobody ever got beyond 100, the closet before I quit was a high schooler who was on a 73 game tear.
Those pale in comparison to some of the world records I think are in the 10,000 games and up level.
The vegas setting had a money balance that would persist trough the games. And you started at -52$ if I remember correctly; usually my goal was to get over 200$ and clear the board. I would get this in about two out of three attempts.
Since with vegas you can only deal the deck three times, there is a strategy where you use the first deal and scan the deck, so you can reach the aces and lower numbers in the remaining two deals. But I quit playing before I got to master that.
Four months later the previous record holder, Harry Hong, took back the title with a 4,988-line run (about 5x Lori's run), which remains the record to this day.
Here's a collection of public statements by Twin Galaxies on the littany of inaccuracies in the film.
It follows one man's journey to gather the best Tetris players in the world for the first "Classic Tetris World Championship", as well as the preparation of the players, who try to break a new record, or to reach the unattainable level 30.
If you like obsessive people and want to learn more about the boundaries of Tetris, I recommend this documentary.
She's been destroyed by Harry Hong though.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=jw...
It gets particularly incredible at the 5:10 mark.
Wow, that sounds sub-optimal.
http://www.ign.com/articles/2012/07/21/apple-co-founders-tet...
I just checked Minesweeper records and the best they have is 3. Why is my name not up there in lights?http://www.minesweeper.info/wiki/World_Record_History#Offici...
The expert record of 32 is really impressive. I can't finish intermediate in 32.
Be sure to watch the credits.
The International Video Game Hall of Fame
It's a financial game, but better and faster than Monopoly, the highest performer (best investor/player) still wins, but at least everybody makes money, hell everybody starts with capital. Each the same amount of capital, how often do you see that :-)
Growth stocks are involved, with bonuses (which can almost be regarded as follow-on rounds adding to exits, until game-end liquidation) rather than dividends. Quite easy to learn
In the '70's, it appeared for the Apple and the Commodore PET. There was also a slightly more modern DOS version which was from Avalon-Hill, the successor to 3M for their games:
http://www.webnoir.com/bob/sid/acquire.zip
There is also another version from Bill Humphrey, the 1966 playing rules are in a DOC file within this ZIP (tailored to his PC version):
http://www.webnoir.com/bob/sid/acquire2.zip
Each player also is issued an information card you will need for proper financial planning:
http://www.webnoir.com/bob/sid/acquirecard.htm
The numbers on top in the blue header are the size of the hotel chain. The upper number (low $) in each cell is the share price for the named chains in the left-hand cell. The middle number (high $) in each cell is the bonus amount for majority holder of the named chains upon exit/liquidation. The bottom number (not-as-high $) in each cell is the bonus amount for second-majority holder of the named chains upon exit/liquidation.
Here's an alternate:
http://boardgamegeek.com/filepage/44033/acquire-3m-version-c...
and another:
https://megacquire.com/zencart/images/Six-Info-Cards-+-Lg-Ca...
and another:
https://megacquire.com/zencart/images/Enlarged-Info-Card-B.j...
While I was looking for my original 3M hard copy edition to bring to my local makerspace for the young board gamers I did find a better user vs PC version from G.C.Crawshay, also DOS but have confirmed it will play in WinXP or Win7 if you have a 32-bit PC:
http://www.george.crawshay.com/cgi/products.pl?game=Acquire
Naturally it will play from a bootable DOS floppy as well. Some are surprised when you can fire up any old surplus PC having a floppy drive and it works ideally without having to have a working HDD in the system. No mouse either. USB floppy drives work too.
EDIT: I believe the floppy will also play on a 64-bit PC
Maybe if gamers didn't think it's ok to casually objectify female gamers there would be more women playing and it wouldn't be such a big deal that this player was a woman.
I'm also not sure how calling someone pretty objectifies them.
Bodybuilders build their bodies. Her accomplishment was scoring highly.
I've never really thought about it before, but maybe the most natural solution is to just level the playing field rather than trying to get a big group of people to stop doing something that they more or less naturally do. We're definitely seeing this happen with celebrities and big budget movies, for instance. Nobody's stopped objectifying women, but they have started objectifying men more than ever before, at least as far as I can tell. I've heard more about Chris Pratt being hot this week than I have about any female celebrity, for instance, including his female costar Zoe Saldana.
That's because the people who think objectification of women is bad tend to also think objectification of men is bad. Those people don't want to live in a world of ubiquitous or or even just balanced objectification; they want to live in a world with none.
Even if it is natural, that doesn't mean it's desireable. That's just an appeal to nature.
While laws are an extreme method, they're routinely used to better ourselves, and even more often to better others. It's worked for (what we currently consider) undesireable behaviours like theft, smoking in public places, environmental pollution, seatbelt wearing, illegal parking, murder, and looking funny at cops. That's a pretty varied list, so why wouldn't it work for sexual objectification? I don't think we should use such a drastic approach, but it's not ridiculous, either.
_____
* Cowardly assuming we're all in the West.
Both. There's still a lot of latent homophobia throughout the US. What I mean by that is that there are many folks who are decidedly pro-gay-rights, but still feel uncomfortable around the sexualization of the male gender.
There's one thing I'm interested in: happiness. What's going to make the most people happy? Many laws that are morally prescriptivist, like those banning gay marriage, end up just oppressing people because it turns out gay marriage is perfectly fine and doesn't harm anyone.
I don't believe open displays of sexuality are harmful to anyone so long as we don't have double standards and we do exercise good judgment. So the idea of outright banning them by law does indeed seem completely ridiculous to me. It's just as ridiculous to me as banning gay marriage or banning porn or banning prostitution.
The reason we do have double standards is precisely because we've been led to believe over generations that the sexualization of men is wrong. Because many men haven't learned to be comfortable with their own gender, homophobia has been able to flourish for decades. It's gross when two guys kiss, right? Of course it is--you can find millions of people who will agree with you because they've carefully been hidden from that their entire life. Banning sexualization and sexual objectification will just lead to future generations who are even more incapable of coping with the realities of human sexuality in ways that aren't immensely harmful to many people.
Nevertheless, I decided that I should go ask my girlfriend what she thought about this situation and about your comment. You know, to get the female perspective. Her answer was pretty much in the same boat... And then she starts a 15 minute rant about how modern women are destroying the values set by real feminist women who worked their asses off to achieve some notion of equality, and how Coco Chanel is the reason women now wear pants and hats.
Our collective opinion? The fact that being told you're pretty or handsome is seen as objectification and something to be avoided is because we've become so out of touch with reality and out own humanity that entitlement has become as much a problem as objectification is.