Amazon: Reinventing the Book
newsweek.com
newsweek.com
Just go buy 40 books. By the time you read them all the e-reader will be free. This is not the reinvention of the book, it's just more useless stuff that all of us tech people are tricked into thinking we need.
http://blog.scifi.com/tech/pics/amazon_kindle.jpeg
[grumble] Bezos is a really good businessman, but he seems to have a few weaknesses. The obvious problem with his previous flop (the segue EDIT: segway) was that it looked like a piece of medical equipment...something you ride on into the grave.
Well, what about the "kindle"? It looks similarily therapeutic...maybe a device to help stroke victims re-remember their ABCs.
segway - approx $3000 when portable scooters, roller blades, skateboards, and bikes were a lot cheaper and more convenient
kindel - iphones and even laptops are cheaper, look better, and give you more features. hell even the sony book reader is cheaper
at $400 the kindle is competing with ooma for most expensive new useless product
http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/19/live-from-the-amazon-kind...
A _decent_ e-book reader should be able to read any document format, be easily extensible, _maybe_ support one DRM schemes as an afterthought (to appease the publisher ass-hats) and of course have every other benefit a book has: durability, portability, a touchpad or keyboard for taking notes, waterproofness for the heck of it _and_ excellent connectivity.
Every e-book device I have seen have avoided all of these requirements. I won't buy anything that isn't easier to use and better than my laptop. Not a snowball's chance in hell.
How hard can it be to make a bloody gadget that works right? Every manufacturer should be working to dislodge their heads, but it seems like it is very comfortable in there. In the publishers' orifices, that is.
Bite me.
I've seen the Sony Reader first-hand. There was a demo unit in one of the Border's in Atlanta. It looks a lot cooler than the Amazon device. It is almost as slim as an Apple iPhone. It also has a lot of random ports surrounding the device ... pretty useless if I can't get it to access the things I want it to access. Compared with the OLPC XO, it looks like it'd break if I drop it.
On the other hand, the eInk display is everything the press says it is -- the fonts are crisp and the display is a pleasure to read in standard lighting. It has no backlights -- but neither does a hardback novel. The refresh rate is too slow for animations. It takes almost as long for the page to refresh as turning a page (that's probably perceptual ... I didn't time it with a stopwatch).
It might just be easier to buy the eInk developer kit -- http://www.eink.com/kits/index.html and roll your own. For about a $3k a pop.
Wow, someone in the DRM business admitted that DRM subtracts value.
And it's ugly. I don't care about all of the assuredly wonderful technical features - I don't see myself reading comfortably with a device like this.
I can't believe that an organization known for its human interface design could take 3 years to introduce such a mechanical looking product.
Well, perhaps using it is better than looking at it....
(O.K. so you found a way other than ads to monetize blogs but sucks for me)