Hacker News Reader

Fair point about citizens in developing countries being forced to focus on the short-term. But does that mean it's right for Facebook to take advantage of them in a way that, in the long-term, is questionable at best?

This is about more than just providing heating oil or railroads... this is about their entire information infrastructure, and they're in no position to negotiate.

View on HN

Do you mean that you'd rather have nobody providing these services to the citizens than Facebook doing this?

Do you mean people should stop working toward a more equitable compromise the moment a short-term solution is on the table?

Offer an alternative, or get out of the way.

The alternative is to "get out of the way." Instead of allowing these countries to get to internet access in their own way, and at their own pace, internet.org will hamstring the efforts by providing this free crippled version that will permanently warp these users view of what the internet is and push out smaller local competition that provides real internet.

The very fact that it's called internet.org is obvious proof of the dishonesty at play.

Sometimes the right answer is to do nothing if you don't have anything good to contribute.

Er, or be skeptical, raise the moral issue, and build pressure on Facebook to proceed in a socially responsible way.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com