> DRM is fundamentally and inherently bad, not as a moral proposition (though it may be that, too), but simply at what it is nominally intended to do.
Which often reflects the fact that DRM is used for completely other purposes. None of them good.
Which often reflects the fact that DRM is used for completely other purposes. None of them good.
1. Lack of common sense or just "following the herd" (Lysenkoism).
2. Covering one's incompetence. (Poor sales are blamed on piracy, and DRM is used as a demonstration that they are "doing something about it").
3. Controlling technology progress and direction (like standards poisoning and so on).
And etc.